cm0002@lemmy.cafe to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoReally? The sound is horrible...lemmy.worldimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1881arrow-down17
arrow-up1874arrow-down1imageReally? The sound is horrible...lemmy.worldcm0002@lemmy.cafe to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squarePoem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoAnybody with a pulse can tell. 192 is absolute dog shit. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7rBH6BxtD9A
minus-squarebleistift2@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-21 day agoQuoting the top comments from that video, not even cherry-picking: [Please explain] in-depth, what differences you are hearing and where you are hearing them The “320 kbps MP3s” [used in the test] are either poorly encoded or possibly recompressed I can only tell the difference on songs that I know. It’s usually the highs where the difference is (Meaning that the difference is only audible when you’re quite young.) please make a video on the differences you hear! I can’t recognise them at all This is such a flex please show us what you’re listening for! This should give you an idea that this guy’s performance is not ordinary, and certainly out of the leage of “anybody with a pulse”.
Anybody with a pulse can tell. 192 is absolute dog shit. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7rBH6BxtD9A
Quoting the top comments from that video, not even cherry-picking:
(Meaning that the difference is only audible when you’re quite young.)
This should give you an idea that this guy’s performance is not ordinary, and certainly out of the leage of “anybody with a pulse”.