inb4 ACTCHUALLY

  • NickSterling@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m a big fan of EndeavourOS. I’ve done a manual install of Arch enough times I understand what it’s doing and I don’t care to do it again. Endeavour is configured well enough for my needs.

    • Bankenstein@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      This supports my claim that EndeavourOS is a just-works custom Arch install, and a brilliant one at that.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s the spiritual successor the AntergOs that I was lokking for for a while, Tried manjaro in the meantime and that also just works, until your system ages a bit you do an upgrade and some shit just completely breaks your system.

        EndeavorOs just works, I managed to bork the update one time, but that was my mistake, my mind was on autopilot and even though I read the message about failed package installs I just rebooted, but it didn’t completely bork. my system like manjaro, I recovered it in less than 30 minutes

    • kamenoko@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did an arch from scratch install, it worked, I liked it, and then I installed Endeavor and loved it. That’s the difference.

    • null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same, I’ve done Arch, it was fun. The grub issue borked my system so I hopped to Endeavour and haven’t looked back.

      There’s plenty of little things it sets up by default (like pacman tweaks) that I’d do in my Arch setup anyways, so it genuinely just saves time for me at this point.