As far as the mod action here go, it signals that this is not a place for actual discussion and shareworthy news.
They are proving that their community is not for learning news and seeing stuff you would not otherwise had know it. This is a community to share only the things we all know/believe in.
The article is by CNN based on about 80 pages report by Dinah Project and shared and discussed by other outlets:
And other outlets.
The conclusion for me here is clear.
Like amnesty which their reports focus on all crimes regardless who commit it. Amnestry has report about israel, russia , iran, china , hamas etc
Amnesty tried to both sides Ukraine war lol
When they report crimes from both hamas and israel does it mean they both side the genocide? It’s job is to report about anybody the agressor and the aggressed, the occupier and the occupied
How does amnesty “remove” abuses?
What abuses did Ukraine a tuallt commit? Didn’t they back track on that once they got called out for being infiltrated by Russia.
I meant report abuses. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/08/ukraine-ukrainian-fighting-tactics-endanger-civilians
That doesn’t mean they justify russian agression What is your evidence of russian infiltrating it?
https://lieber.westpoint.edu/expert-panels-review-amnesty-internationals-ai-allegations-ukrainian-ihl-violations/
No direct evidence but the sloppiness of the job they did on that report along with timing and how Russia weaponized I dictats to me that they were politically motivated to rush it out
No direct evidence is no evidence. There is over 500 publications about russian abuses in their website
Some valid evidences would be something like some employees has tweets blaming ukraine for starting the war oe justify russian war crimes or a group tied to russian giving big donations to amnesty.
Your claim is so ridiculous