edit: seems like some people interpret “full of” as a mathematical majority which, while it may or might not be true instance to instance, isn’t my intent in posting

feel free to swap in “has a lot of” if that’s more familiar language to you :)

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    honestly very correct. someone else pointed out that even the worst of us states were only 70/30 maga.

    call me a bleeding heart lib but i don’t celebrate the suffering of 10 people just because 7 of them asked for it. 🙃

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I adovacte for their survival, recovery, repentance, and penance in proportion to the weight of their crimes.

          • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Not even true lol (You were alive immediately after the civil war wow!) Yeah and sadly slave owners literally received reparations when there should have been Nurembergs.

            • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Thafuq are you on? Their “crimes” were downplayed and hardly anyone was executed for the endless list of subhuman behavior they only too gleefully perpetrated.

                  • xorollo@leminal.space
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 hours ago

                    No, I wasn’t sure if you were distinguishing between Nuremberg or the slave owners. You write “their” but there are two possible groups that could be applied to, and possibly both. Your message changes based on how I read “their”, so just seeking clarification on what you’re trying to say.

              • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                either u are being sarcastic or u 180 degree misinterpreted my comment, we are saying the same thing? /confused

                  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    12 hours ago

                    i guess maybe you were meaning “that’s what we did” as advocating for slaveholder punishment where i interpreted it as actually doing it