• limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    There is a reason the only branches of Christianity to survive were those not trying to break away from Rome.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      But numerous non-Roman branches of Christianity survived?

      Christians used Rome as a tool against their enemies much more than the reverse.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I don’t know, I always assumed the later branches evolved from the ones that survived inside empire the first 200 years. I could be wrong ?

        Edit phrase

        • PugJesus@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Of the major branches, only those derived from Catholic/Orthodox sects (including Protestants) are those which evolved inside the Empire.

          Those derived from the Nestorian and Oriental Orthodox Churches evolved in the Caucasus and Mesopotamia, in regions outside of Rome’s control or where its control was marginal, and in Ethiopia.

          • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I looked up those, on Wikipedia, because I don’t know much, and they both evolved after 300, and seem to be evolved from ideas that grew inside the empire before then.

            I would be interested in finding sects that started before the year 200 that were founded outside of Roman controlled areas. I am sure there are but would need a name to look up