Yeah because the Democrats are so Pro Palestinian 🙄
Do you admit that, in principle, putting aside the issue of the Dem position on Palestine which we will discuss immediately after this, giving support to the genocide of Palestinians because you were told that “leftists can’t win” is not only immensely juvenile, but outright murderous and ghoulish?
EDIT: Don’t bother responding, as you’ve pointed out elsewhere that you’re a pro-genocide fascist who believes that Ukrainians should submit to Russian genocide, we have nothing to talk about. I don’t debate with Nazis.
Russian genocide? I decry the actions of Russia as they they’re completely imperialistic and have committed war crimes but they’re certainly not committing a genocide. Last I checked Palestinians are dying 20 times as fast as the ukrainians are. And there’s a whole lot of you claim for ukrainians to run to. Gaza is the size of a small town.
Doesn’t change the fact that this was a war that was absolutely provoked by the United States through 20 years of aggressive NATO action against Russia. It doesn’t change the fact that in 2022 when Ukraine and Russia almost had a peace deal when Boris Johnson showed up and told zelensky that if he worked directly with Russia, that he would lose support of United Kingdom, the United States, and NATO. Naturally the war continued to the great profits of Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Rathyeon, Microsoft, Google, Palntir.
No one cares about your genocide apologia and denial, Nazi, nor your blatant misinformation in contradiction to basic facts in an attempt to justify fascist imperialism.
Calling you a Nazi isn’t an ad hominem. An ad hominem would be saying that your arguments are wrong because you’re a Nazi. But your arguments are wrong on their own merits, and simply prove that you’re a Nazi, not the other way around.
Buddy I bet you couldn’t even Define what a Nazi is.
Your epistology is looking wonderful in these threads.
Surely people will come here and find your arguments to be well-reasoned and not at all fraught with logical failures inconsistencies and historical inaccuracies only using sources that I link
Yes you were ever the clever orator in this thread
Yeah because the Democrats are so Pro Palestinian 🙄
Do you admit that, in principle, putting aside the issue of the Dem position on Palestine which we will discuss immediately after this, giving support to the genocide of Palestinians because you were told that “leftists can’t win” is not only immensely juvenile, but outright murderous and ghoulish?
EDIT: Don’t bother responding, as you’ve pointed out elsewhere that you’re a pro-genocide fascist who believes that Ukrainians should submit to Russian genocide, we have nothing to talk about. I don’t debate with Nazis.
Removed by mod
No one cares about your genocide apologia and denial, Nazi, nor your blatant misinformation in contradiction to basic facts in an attempt to justify fascist imperialism.
Keep repeating the same lines about me being a fascist and Russian genocide supporter. That’s fine.
I mean it’s clear you’re diverting to ad hominem attacks because you can’t actually refute anything I’m saying
Face it the only thing you’re able to do is parrot the propaganda of the United States and NATO.
“Debate me, debate me!” the Nazi says.
I reiterate:
Comrade. Your history knowledge and ability to see through propaganda is almost completely non existence
Can’t handle debate get off a political community.
Also still an ad hominem. Looks like people you have to be a fan of the wonderful streamer destiny. This is particular favorite tactic of his.
Calling you a Nazi isn’t an ad hominem. An ad hominem would be saying that your arguments are wrong because you’re a Nazi. But your arguments are wrong on their own merits, and simply prove that you’re a Nazi, not the other way around.
So I reiterate:
Buddy I bet you couldn’t even Define what a Nazi is.
Your epistology is looking wonderful in these threads.
Surely people will come here and find your arguments to be well-reasoned and not at all fraught with logical failures inconsistencies and historical inaccuracies only using sources that I link
Yes you were ever the clever orator in this thread