• poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    The linked Reuters article provides a bit more context:

    The jury agreed with the plaintiffs that Alphabet’s Google (GOOGL.O), was liable for sending and receiving information from the devices without permission while they were idle, causing what the lawsuit had called “mandatory and unavoidable burdens shouldered by Android device users for Google’s benefit.”

    […]

    Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said in a statement that the company would appeal, and that the verdict “misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices.”

    • trashboat@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      opens new tab

      the verdict “misunderstands services that are critical to the security, performance, and reliability of Android devices.”

      Ummmm maybe I’m misunderstanding but how on earth is opening a new tab critical to security and performance?

      • gex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I think that’s just part of the label of a link to Google’s stock ticker