This is what the admins of .ml cultivate, as documented in the megathread

Credible sources removed just within the last day: https://lemmy.world/post/32298242 https://lemmy.world/post/32426343

.ml is not much different than the rest of the Triad, continued federation with them is continuing to allow them to spread toxic misinformation and behavior across the Threadiverse.

If you’re an instance admin, please consider defederation.

Users, consider joining the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance.

Other wonderful content, and this is just from when I looked at the local new feed a bit ago:

Classic RT I’m sure you all know and Pravda.ru “Pravda Report”

  • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
    48·
    3 days ago

    Radio Free [Region] is literally a mouthpiece of blatant western imperialist

    Ok prove it then, surely something so widely known and “blatant” to be an outlet for misinformation would have numerous online, credible, sources with their evidence

    • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      94·
      3 days ago

      Radio Liberty was literally initiated by the CIA and has been controlled by the “United States Agency for Global Media” since it was privatised, please look it up…

      Even fucking Wikipedia has it listed in the first 3 paragraphs

      • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
        38·
        3 days ago

        Lol, I already have

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:RFE/RL

        Additional considerations apply to the use of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL). RFE/RL should be used cautiously, if at all, for reporting published from the 1950s to the early 1970s, when RFE/RL had a documented relationship with the CIA.

        RFE/RL may be biased in some subject areas (particularly through omission of relevant, countervailing facts), and in those areas, it should be attributed in the article body. There is no consensus as to what subject areas require attribution. The scope of topics requiring attribution of RFE/RL should be decided on a case-by-case basis.

        It hasn’t been true for some time now and is generally found to be credible and fairly unbiased and RFA is seen in even a more positive light:

        Radio Free Asia can be generally considered a reliable source. In particularly geopolitically charged areas, attribution of its point of view and funding by the U.S. government may be appropriate. Per the result of a 2021 RfC, editors have established that there is little reason to think RFA demonstrates some systematic inaccuracy, unreliability, or level of government co-option that precludes its use.

        And MBFC:

        In contrast this is what RT looks like:

        • Jack@slrpnk.net
          95·
          2 days ago

          I love how you point to this media bias site like it’s the gospel. Have you considered thinking by yourself for once?