• spunow@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “Nanook” is a slur for northern indigenous people in the same way “Chan” is a slur for Chinese people. Sure, there might be some members of that demographic with that name, but using the term as a generalization for that demographic is derogatory in intent.

    Using the term “Eskimo” in the instance name is problematic for at least two reasons.

    1. The term itself is considered problematic and derogatory for reasons I don’t have time to go into here, but feel free to research why it’s under fire.

    2. I haven’t checked, but the admins are probably not part of the demographics that the term would refer to, so they’re not “reclaiming a slur” so to speak

    • madlian@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The comparison between “Nanook” and “Chan” is misleading and not linguistically equivalent. “Nanook” originates from Inuit mythology and is not inherently a slur, while “Chan” has been used in explicitly mocking or derogatory ways. It’s important to recognize the context and history behind each term rather than assume they carry the same weight.