Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works ·
edit-2
22 hours ago

Seems to be a pattern

discuss.online

message-square
91
fedilink
814

Seems to be a pattern

discuss.online

ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works ·
edit-2
22 hours ago
message-square
91
fedilink

https://xcancel.com/theliamnissan/status/1939721061710574072#m

The Idaho shooter who killed two fire fighters. https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/30/us/idaho-fire-shooter-wess-roley

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    1 day ago

    it’s not “doxxing” when they posted that photo themselves voluntarily. especially since there’s no home address, work address, phone number, etc. they obviously want the world to know they’re maga. and now the world does.

    fuck them

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It is doxxing when you grab a photo and then add information to it saying “these are the parents of the person you hate, go hate them too” and spread it to hundreds of people. And the only reason you don’t see it is because you don’t like the political party they support.

      • daisy lazarus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 hours ago

        That is not, in fact, doxxing.

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It is, and I have described why in two posts down this chain already with provided definitions.

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        12 hours ago

        couple things: a) you’re free to try and change the definition of words to make them mean whatever you want them to mean, but no one else is obliged to follow your based-on-feelings definition. doxxing is defined as providing private information, of which this post has none. it is NOT doxxing, and you are the only one here who can’t stand the fact that it’s not

        and b) you say “you don’t like the political party” as if maga-branded fascism deserves equal consideration as a valid stance on anything. again, you’re free to think that, but you’re not convincing anyone else.

        and finally (again): fuck those asshole parents, fuck trump, and fuck trump voters

        • Maalus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          My definition of doxxing comes from wikipedia and is supported. People here think their opinion of what doxxing is, is real, despite no proof or actual definition. I already went through the definition and shown that this is indeed doxxing. Want to read it, here

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing

          And yes, this post contains private information. It contains the information of “these are this guys parents” which would only be known to the select few neighbors at best. Furthermore, it contains information about their political beliefs. So yes, it absolutely is doxxing with the intention of shaming the parents. The info doesn’t need to be completely private and hidden - aggregating info from public databases or facebook counts as well.

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 hours ago

            https://thesportsgrail.com/who-are-jason-roley-and-heather-lynn-kuuipo-cuchiara-parents-of-wess-roley-and-more-about-the-idaho-shooters-family-mom-dad-step-father-and-mother/

            https://houseandwhips.com/wess-roley-parents/

            https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/who-are-wess-roley-s-parents-idaho-shooters-mother-once-accused-his-father-of-violent-threats-101751318259257.html

            https://gazettedirect.com/wess-roley-family-maga/

            https://www.ghlinks.com.gh/wess-roley-parents-heather-lynn-kuuipo-cuchiara-tony-cuchiara/

            https://scallywagandvagabond.com/2025/06/wess-val-roley-coeur-dalene-sniper-troubled-childhood-maga-parents/

            it looks like you have a lot of angry letters to write regarding all these news outlets “doxxing” those poor innocent fascist assholes

            get to work

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yup, so just proving further that law doesn’t apply to people you don’t like.

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            “these are this guys parents”

            nope. that’s not “private” information. they posted that photo on their own, and however OP found out it was the parents, was publicly posted as well. it’s NOT doxxing, no matter how blue in the face you make yourself insisting that it is.

            the post is fine, because it’s not doxxing.

            • Maalus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Historically, the term has been used to refer to both the aggregation of this information from public databases and social media websites (like Facebook), and the publication of previously private information obtained through criminal or otherwise fraudulent means

              Literal quote from the wikipedia article I linked. It. Is. Doxxing.

              • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                10 hours ago

                lol not to say wikipedia is always wrong, but you shouldn’t be basing your arguments on [citation needed] definitions

                let’s go with the actual definition:

                https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/doxxing

                : to publicly identify or publish private information about (someone) especially as a form of punishment or revenge

                no private information. not doxxing

                https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/doxing

                the action of finding or publishing private information about someone on the internet without their permission, especially in a way that reveals their name, address, etc.:

                no private information. not doxxing

                https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365-life-hacks/privacy-and-safety/what-is-doxing

                When someone is doxed, their personal or private information is released into the world

                no private information. not doxxing

                look dude. it’s not doxxing, and you’re not going to somehow turn it into doxxing in this thread. but by all means waste your whole day on it. i’m done

                not doxxing

                • Maalus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Definition from oxford languages, search for and publish private or IDENTIFYING information about an individual, typically with malicious intent.

                  You are literally arguing semantics on something that is obviously doxxing because you don’t like the fact that someone got doxxed that you don’t like. For every definition that doesn’t specifically say “identifiable” information, there are three that do. But by all means, you go out and find the ones that let you sleep at night. I’m done with having a “world battle” over something that’s despicable behavior.

      • selfdefense420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Removed by mod

        • faultyproboscus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Just block the person and move on with your day.

          • Maalus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 hours ago

            If you look at the account you replied to, it is made two weeks ago with the sole intention of swearing at people who disagree with them. They will not take your advice.

People Twitter@sh.itjust.works

whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it’s a major figure or a politician.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.27K users / day
  • 3.15K users / week
  • 9K users / month
  • 19.8K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 7.53K subscribers
  • 1.32K Posts
  • 59.1K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org