• Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    We’re not all from the US, but yes all the western block got anti-Ussr colored info. Still there is little you can find that can make a critical mind see Stalin as anything but a dictator. There are things you can admire in Marx, Trotsky and even Lenin, but if you cannot see how Stalin hijacked the revolution to make his own autocratic empire that while somewhat communism flavored, was structurally not that different of a fascist state, then you are willfully blind. The leader worship, the paranoia, the constant surveillance, those have no place in a communist society.

    It is those aspects precisely that make Sanders equate the republicans to stalinists. I think the comparison is apt.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Stalin did massively advance Russian science and industrialization. But he did so at a massive human toll. Also his role in fighting Hitler is so minimized that people think he colluded with Hitler when the USSR basically defeated Hitler by themselves at Stalingrad and America swooped in afterwards.

      • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        The USSR did the greater part in defeating nazi Germany, seriously nobody who knows a thing about the fall of the 3rd Reich could deny that. They did so at a huge cost in soldiers and material. This is something that the world should thank the people of the USSR for, their sacrifice was terrible. However it was not Stalin defeating the nazi’s single handedly. His troops and officers did, nor did Stalin do this out of the goodness of his heart or through personal heroics. It was a fight for survival.