• Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      With the current significance of the movement represented by the “LGB Alliance” I don’t think it’s undue to stress the T.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        LGBTQ+ is 100% covered by the rainbow flag. It is absolutely ridiculous to claim otherwise.

        This is like insisting the American flag is only for Republicans.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not saying it’s not covered; I’m saying the “progressive” flags emphasize it in a time when some are attempting to co-opt the rainbow to marginalize them.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Tbf, a lot of that was driven by the wave of transwomen getting mad that lesbians aren’t attracted to them. And I never saw any pushback against these posts in the trans community.

        Was there right-wing groups amplifying the reach of these comments? Yes. Should the entire trans community suffer for a small number of assholes among their ranks? Hell no.

        Regardless, the lack of pushback in the trans community and its effects shows the need for groups to self-regulate to some degree. There’s assholes in every group, and pretending that there aren’t is dangerous.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            The BBC has an article that gives a decent overview: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-57853385

            And Vice isn’t doing anyone favors by leaning into the transphobia spin: https://www.vice.com/en/article/whats-wrong-with-the-no-trans-dating-preference-debate/

            A lot of this is also from personal memory. I was plugged into a lot of different communities 2018-2021on all sides of the aisle.

            Thankfully people aren’t yelling at lesbians about this anymore, at least not what I’ve seen. Unfortunately, the damage has already been done.

            Also unfortunately, it seems that people aren’t understanding the point of my original comment. And it’s that every group has some number of assholes in it, and it’s up to the group as a whole to make sure that said assholes don’t ruin their reputation.

            This isn’t meant to bash transpeople. It’s meant as a cautionary tale to avoid letting a minority of assholes set how everyone else sees the group.

            • shinyrat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              That BBC article does not give a decent overview. It’s hard to imagine a worse source. Google “lily cade BBC” and you’ll see what I mean

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      My autisitic son insists that pink isn’t a real color and has no business being included in any rainbow.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It doesn’t have a corresponding wavelength in the spectrum of visible light, but as we perceive it to be there and have a name for it, it doesn’t really matter that there’s no specific wavelength it corresponds to.

        By that metric abstract things likely love, justice, duty, honour, could be argued to not be real either. Can’t touch them or there’s no corresponding physical thing in the world to measure them.

        • Ziglin (it/they)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I believe the triangle having that shape is relevant because of other pride flags with that layout (demisexual at least) but I do find the one you posted a little nicer.

          I don’t really understand why progress pride flag with the intersex flag is so rare though either.

          • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            The chevron is a shape present in many flags in general.

            I don’t really understand why progress pride flag with the intersex flag is so rare though either.

            Me neither.

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Definitely a strong motif of “covering up” the original rainbow/message. Black is by far the largest element. And the fold in forward implies the symmetry of the trans flag, this just completely ignores it.

    • huppakee@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree, we dont need more than the rainbow flag. But I feel people can put on it whatever they want. Except their genitals maybe.