• BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    public broadcast

    Or, as we call it when it’s a non-white country: “State propaganda outlet”

    • anon@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Funny that you tie that to the skin color of the people. Most people including me make the distinction based on the following criteria:

      1. Does the government have direct control over the broadcast?
      2. Is the channel allowed to criticize the government?
      3. Is founding decided by the government?
      4. Are you at risk for not having the same stance on a topic than the government?

      In the case of Germany, all of these are not true. In the case of authoritarian regimes, they are. That is the key difference.

        • anon@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          The government obviously has some influence, that is undeniable. But it’s limited and saying that they don’t criticize the government is just wrong. You can watch many channels on YouTube. You can look at it yourself. They do that and it is undeniable too. Also, the government is prohibited by law to decide the founding. They have minimal influence on the total budget, but they can’t decide who gets how much.

      • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So, a bunch of vague, unquantifiable, vibes based criteria, that, in practice, always end up meaning: