While WEI is thankfully cancelled, it’s not entirely cancelled… They’re planning on making it available still in WebViews with the intention that websites can check if a malicious Android app is trying to do a phishing scheme.

Seems like such a niche “security” feature… what are they really trying to accomplish here? Something seems fishy to me

  • fsniper@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    this is not cancellation. This is Google taking a step back, and regroup to attack back.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Its a common practice to do exactly that. Just demand something very absurd and let people rage about it, then “step back” to “please the masses” while in reality your “step back” idea is the thing you actually wanted to do from the beginning on. But now people are happy about it.

      • Ænima@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I learned that as a negotiation tactic. Pick the number you want to get, then ask for more. The counter will likely be around what you wanted!

    • catboss@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      They care about one thing only: Money.

      Obviously this is more of a strategic retreat and nothing else. It’s also a very common tactic to push for something crass, pull back, wait a bit and repeat. Most commonly resistance gets weaker each time, because people are people.

      Now if anyone thinks they made money with a retreat and won’t try again, because it’s obviously much more lucrative, which stone exactly are you living under?

      You are 100% correct. Nothing is won till you make it impossible for Google to push forward or destroy their motivation for trying again later.

    • interolivary@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ha, I didn’t know there’s a name for that, but it’s definitely what I assume they’re going to do. My initial reaction was to wonder what they’ll now present as the “reasonable” option to WEI.

      Considering they’re rolling it out in Android, maybe they’ll just wait a moment and then integrate it into desktop Chrome as well, just without any of the fanfare?

    • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      A win is when we have forced them to abandon the wretched plan. Them taking it elsewhere with a different name, only to be brought back in the future isn’t a win - it’s more or less the folly the Trojans committed with the Greek wooden horse.

        • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t trust Google’s word that they will keep it that way. Besides, would you have accepted this proposal if WEI wasn’t proposed first? It’s a form of manipulation.

          • Big P@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Sites inside webviews can already communicate with the app running them, I don’t see how this proposal in this form causes any additional problems

            • 4dpuzzle@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              The same can be said about WEI on browsers. Just wait till it becomes a problem - only problem is that you won’t be able to escape it at that point.

              • Big P@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Except websites can’t just communicate directly with the OS like they can in webviews

      • java@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        We have won the battle, but the war is not over. If one is tired, he or she could employ escapism. But don’t blame or poke those, who don’t do that.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    They grew thanks to the open internet where everyone let them scrape their website’s content. They can’t let anyone do that again.

    • thingsiplay@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s what Google want you to believe, forget about and step back. It’s not over yet. We just stopped the first wave and it will get harder with each wave.

    • Vincent@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Specifically, everyone who’s not using Chrome and its derivates did it. Use Firefox, people.

    • maaj@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If it’s still available I some capacity, we didn’t do much. We gotta remain vigilant.

      • Takatakatakatakatak@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        If you are aware of this issue, it is your obligation to tell all of your friends, family, associates and coworkers to stop using Chrome immediately, and try out a new search engine.

        It’s the least you can do.

        This behaviour by Google is not going to stop. The mask has slipped too many times. They have become the very thing they swore to destroy.

        Not many people will be ready to de Google their phones and stop buying their products. It’s the little things that will hurt them the most and show they’ve stepped over a line this last year or so.

      • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        We gotta remain vigilant.

        Agreed, but I disagree about the first part. It being only available in webviews can’t really be abused and makes all the difference. Sure they could try to reintroduce all the bad stuff, even if the had cancelled it altogether, but for now this is a success.

        • maaj@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Had to go brush up on what webviews was. you’re right, that really isn’t a big deal For WEI to be implemented on it

          Big edit: nope! My original statement was correct, this is going to screw over people who use things like NewPipe, reVanced or Spotube on Android! F*** Google and WEI for Android!

        • redw0rm@kerala.party
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I don’t know about graphene, but doesn’t some android roms allow to use custom ( more private Webview implementations) instead of default ?

                • Pantherina@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Firefox doesnt provide a webview for some reason.

                  Its really shitty, because it could be a better standard for webapps on Linux too. But now we have electron, which is basically compatible with firefox as its web technology

              • shym3q@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                if you root, you can install open webview module.

                currently using mulch webview and updating it in f-droid

                • Pantherina@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah I did that too. Mulch or Vanadium, I would recommend Vanadium. Bromite is dead. Cromite maybe, but really just use Vanadium its the most degoogled and secure one.

                  But apart from that, the developer options make no sense if there is no way to actually install one without root.

                  Also, openwebview replaces the installed one, doesnt it?