- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
Made with KolourPaint and screenshots from Kate (with the GitHub theme).
Made with KolourPaint and screenshots from Kate (with the GitHub theme).
What about
Let ret: Number If (someCondition) { <a lot of expensive calculations> ret = resultOfOperations } else { <a lot of other different expensive operations> ret = resultOfOtherOperations } return ret
You can’t declare ret inside the brackets
let ret = someCondition ? expensiveOperation() : otherOperation()
?
Yeah. That works.
Rust would allow you to
let ret = if some_condition { <a lot of expensive calculations> result_of_operations } else { <a lot of other different expensive calculations> result_of_other_operations };
Now you don’t have to declare it inside the blocks.
Similarly, Perl lets you say
my $ret = do { if (...) { ... } else { ... }};
That’s… Disgusting
It’s the same thing as ternary, just without the
? :
syntax.What’s disgusting about it? The only thing I can think of is the implicit return, which felt a bit icky at first.
Also, as the if expression is an expression, you can call methods on it like so:
if 1 > 2 { 3 } else { 4 }.min(5)
(the above is still an expression, so it could be used, for example, as part of a condition for another if)
Of course, you can write horrible code in any language, but the ability to use blocks where expressions are expected can be great sometimes.