• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    The technology would be extremely easy to adapt, with the certs being tied to the original recording equipment hardware. Given i don’t see a $60 ip cam having a dolphin board it would probably be relegated to much higer end equipment, but any modification with a new key would break the chain of veracity

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is blatantly not true, it would be extremely simple to circumvent. How do you “tie” the cert to a specific hardware without trusting manufacturers? You just can’t, it’s like putting a padlock on a pizzabox.

      • Rossphorus@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        As with everything, trust is required eventually. It’s more about reducing the amount of trust required than removing it entirely. It’s the same with HTTPS - website certificates only work if you trust the root certificate authorities, for example. Root manufacturer keys may only be certified if they have passed some level of trust with the root authority/authorities. Proving that trust is well-founded is more a physical issue than an algorithmic one. As it is with root CAs it may involve physical cybersecurity audits, etc.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I literally explained earlier how this exact technology is used in digital cinema dude c’mon.

        • Valmond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          That doesn’t mean it’s useful for forensics, IMO.

          Edit: not saying it wont be though, just that it’s not as bullet proof as you’d think, IMO.