geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 days agoHere we go againlemmy.mlimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1342arrow-down113
arrow-up1329arrow-down1imageHere we go againlemmy.mlgeneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to Progressive Politics@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoeven if that were true, the principle of M.A.D. suggests that for maximal stability, opposing factions should have nukes. Iran not having nukes is too big of an advantage for Israel, even if nobody ever uses them.
minus-squareDr. Moose@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·13 hours agoIts crazy to see people advocate Iran having nukes. We went full circle into a paradox of tolerance.
even if that were true, the principle of M.A.D. suggests that for maximal stability, opposing factions should have nukes. Iran not having nukes is too big of an advantage for Israel, even if nobody ever uses them.
Its crazy to see people advocate Iran having nukes. We went full circle into a paradox of tolerance.