Nope: “along with more than 10 schoolmates at 7.15am.” The Straits Times "On boarding the train, Kana takes her seat amongst her schoolmates who got on board at earlier stations. Most of the passengers, indeed, are students at the Engaru Highschool. " The Online Citizen
Also, reducing human overpopulation is a good things because human overpopulation is the biggest cause of anthropogenic climate change (compare it to other causes), and the root cause of it. It’s also the root cause of the anthropocene extinction event and of that becoming a mass extinction event, and of factory farming, and of industrial fishing, and of habitat degradation and destruction, and of unsustainable pollution, …
humans civilization existed for over 10 thousand years, modern capitalism has existed for a couple hundred and is literally destroying the planet.
smart person online: “If we have to choose between Coca-Cola or a liveable planet, I choose exctintion, you know, instead of actually hurting the handful of billionaires who are destroying the planet”
The fall in human population is happening at way too slow a pace to help the environmental crisis. At the same time, it’s happening at way too fast a pace that it’s going to trigger multiple social crisis’ around the end of the century.
Overpopulation combined with the inefficient resource consumption of modern society. If our resource usage per person reduced at the same rate that population increased, it wouldn’t be a big deal.
Also that graph is ridiculous. If there was one less child born per person alive, there would be zero children being born in most developed countries (it takes two people to have a child, which would mean two less children per couple). Of COURSE that would result in a drastically reduced carbon footprint, because we’d die out.
Nope: “along with more than 10 schoolmates at 7.15am.” The Straits Times "On boarding the train, Kana takes her seat amongst her schoolmates who got on board at earlier stations. Most of the passengers, indeed, are students at the Engaru Highschool. " The Online Citizen
Also, reducing human overpopulation is a good things because human overpopulation is the biggest cause of anthropogenic climate change (compare it to other causes), and the root cause of it. It’s also the root cause of the anthropocene extinction event and of that becoming a mass extinction event, and of factory farming, and of industrial fishing, and of habitat degradation and destruction, and of unsustainable pollution, …
humans civilization existed for over 10 thousand years, modern capitalism has existed for a couple hundred and is literally destroying the planet.
smart person online: “If we have to choose between Coca-Cola or a liveable planet, I choose exctintion, you know, instead of actually hurting the handful of billionaires who are destroying the planet”
The fall in human population is happening at way too slow a pace to help the environmental crisis. At the same time, it’s happening at way too fast a pace that it’s going to trigger multiple social crisis’ around the end of the century.
Overpopulation combined with the inefficient resource consumption of modern society. If our resource usage per person reduced at the same rate that population increased, it wouldn’t be a big deal.
Also that graph is ridiculous. If there was one less child born per person alive, there would be zero children being born in most developed countries (it takes two people to have a child, which would mean two less children per couple). Of COURSE that would result in a drastically reduced carbon footprint, because we’d die out.
Don’t get my hopes up
Bold strategy to double-down on the antinatalism after the recent terrorist attack by a hardline antinatalist.