Archived version of AP article (archive.org)


“Britain to invest further 14.2 billion pounds in Sizewell C nuclear project” (Reuters)

Reuters article:
  • Summary
  • Takes total government investment to 17.8 billion pounds
  • Project will supply 6 million homes with electricity
  • Total expected cost of the project not revealed

LONDON, June 10 (Reuters) - Britain will invest a further 14.2 billion pounds ($19.25 billion) to build the Sizewell C nuclear plant in southeast England, the government said on Tuesday, as part of its wider spending review which will define its priorities over the next four years.

Britain is seeking to build new nuclear plants to replace its ageing fleet to boost its energy security, reach its climate targets and also create new jobs.

Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.

The funding announced on Tuesday takes the total amount the government has committed to the project to 17.8 billion pounds, with 3.6 billion pounds invested prior to the spending review.

“This Labour Government is launching a new era of nuclear power here in Britain,” Chancellor Rachel Reeves told a trade union conference on Tuesday, calling the investment the biggest rollout of nuclear power in a generation.

The Sizewell C plant in Suffolk is expected to create around 10,000 jobs during the peak of construction, and produce enough electricity to power around 6 million homes when built.

Britain has been seeking to bring new investors into the project but Tuesday’s announcement did not mention any other parties.

The government has not said how much the project is expected to cost in total or given a date for when it is expected to be completed.

“With the continued secrecy about Sizewell C’s total cost, how can voters decide whether the 18 billion pounds pledged to Sizewell C is a good use of their money?” said Alison Downes of campaign group Stop Sizewell C.

It would be only the second new nuclear plant built in Britain in more than two decades, after French state-owned EDF’s Hinkley Point C which has had several delays and cost overruns and is currently expected to start operations in 2029, with an estimated cost of between 31 and 34 billion pounds at 2015 prices.

EDF initially said Sizewell C would be around 20% cheaper than Hinkley C.

Simone Rossi, CEO of EDF in the UK welcomed the British government’s decision to go ahead with Sizewell C and said: “It is also a vote of confidence in Hinkley Point C, which has re-started the UK nuclear industry and built the experience and skills that will benefit Sizewell C.”

Sizewell C was originally being developed by EDF and China’s General Nuclear Power Group but the government bought out the Chinese firms stake in 2022 amid security concerns.

The UK government’s stake was 83.8% and EDF’s stake was 16.2% at the end of December, EDF financial results showed in February with EDF’s stake expected to decrease following Tuesday’s announcement.

The project’s developer last December told Reuters there were five investors involved in a bidding process.

($1 = 0.7378 pounds)

  • the_swagmaster@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sure, we could buy lots of solar and wind but we need to diversify our energy supply. If we only had wind and solar and one day all of a sudden there happens to be not enough wind and solar that could cause huge energy instability. Or, what if the Russians cut a cable that brings energy from a large offshore wind/solar farm leading to power uncertainty in the country.

    Obviously those scenarios are unlikely but that doesn’t mean they can’t happen. Having solid, reliable energy is one of the most important things a country needs to be prosperous. Is nuclear perfect? Fuck no, but it’s way better than coal, LNG, or any other fossil fuel energy source that we currently use. I believe having more nuclear power stations to provide a solid fallback option is always beneficial even if they are expensive and are imperfect