• arrow74@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 days ago

    Actually it was an act of war since it was done using the country’s military.

    Piracy is reserved for unaffiliated parties.

    So essentially Israel has committed an act of war against whatever country the boats’ are registered under

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Not Italy. But Swedish, Brazilian, German, Turkish, French, etc.

      Those countries won’t be too happy if Israel is kidnapping their citizens. And those countries may change their financial and diplomatic relationships with Israel as a result.

      Israel cannot continue the genocide without foreign support. Quite literally they need weapons from those countries

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      States doing piracy to each other without war was a staple of the golden age of piracy. It was called privateering.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Right, modern day international law would define that as an act of war.

          • Hawke@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            “Act of war” is not the same as “declaration of war”, in case you were under that impression.

          • arrow74@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It clearly is.

            Just because a nation commits an act of war against you doesn’t mean that you have to declare war and attack. All it means is you have a justifiable cause to retaliate under international law