Pro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comexternal-linkmessage-square503fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down1115cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up11.09Karrow-down1external-linkWe Should Immediately Nationalize SpaceX and Starlinkjacobin.comPro@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square503fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareDeflated0ne@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up104arrow-down3·2 months agoHas anyone considered funding NASA? They made rockets that didn’t explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.
minus-squareUruanna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up37arrow-down1·2 months agoShouldn’t be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.
minus-squareVanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·2 months agoSure, that’s the ideal. Is it likely? Ehhhh
minus-squareUruanna@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoFrom this admin? Nah. It’ll be stolen and given to, idk, Thiel or Vance or whoever, but not nationalized, just reprivatized.
minus-squareRose56@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 months agoThey didn’t, because someone got paid to write this article!
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoWhere’s the grift tho? What’s the angle? How will this enrich an uber-privileged pale bro?
minus-squareGreyEyedGhost@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoLooks like we found someone who believed it was financially necessary for the manufacture of the shuttle to be spread across the country.
minus-squarewewbull@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 months agoIf that was actually their expenditure I don’t think they’d have their budget cut.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoWhat “they made” 50 years ago is of little value now. Expertise matters, and it’s lost with time passing. Still - yes. Nationalization is a bad solution because it gives the state power to nationalize. Seems a truism. Just let NASA work in its normal role. Instead of replacing that with SpaceX contracts.
Has anyone considered funding NASA?
They made rockets that didn’t explode with duct tape and a TI-83 calculator.
Shouldn’t be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.
Sure, that’s the ideal.
Is it likely? Ehhhh
From this admin? Nah. It’ll be stolen and given to, idk, Thiel or Vance or whoever, but not nationalized, just reprivatized.
They didn’t, because someone got paid to write this article!
Where’s the grift tho? What’s the angle? How will this enrich an uber-privileged pale bro?
Looks like we found someone who believed it was financially necessary for the manufacture of the shuttle to be spread across the country.
If that was actually their expenditure I don’t think they’d have their budget cut.
What “they made” 50 years ago is of little value now. Expertise matters, and it’s lost with time passing.
Still - yes. Nationalization is a bad solution because it gives the state power to nationalize. Seems a truism.
Just let NASA work in its normal role. Instead of replacing that with SpaceX contracts.