I didn’t ask the first time, it was a invitation that you did not engage with. Your response implies that no, you do not.
The template comes from the movie “I, Robot” where Will Smith asks the robot if he can compose a symphony, to which the robot asks “Can you?”. The robot is not saying that he can compose a symphony, just that Will Smith also can’t. Your response implies that you do not understand this exchange.
Do you think Will Smith’s character can compose a symphony? Do you think third/no party voting actually stops fascists? If the first, you’ve misunderstood the meme. If the second, you’ve misunderstood reality.
not that you asked a first time, but yes, I understand your flawed meme.
what do you need explained?
I didn’t ask the first time, it was a invitation that you did not engage with. Your response implies that no, you do not.
The template comes from the movie “I, Robot” where Will Smith asks the robot if he can compose a symphony, to which the robot asks “Can you?”. The robot is not saying that he can compose a symphony, just that Will Smith also can’t. Your response implies that you do not understand this exchange.
I can provide further explanation if you need it.
I responded that I do understand your flawed meme, although from your comments, I’m not surprised you got confused by direct language.
you need help. ask for it
The response “Two-party voters couldn’t stop them either.” is evidence that no, you do not.
you’re confused, so you’re lashing out and making things up.
have at it. you’ll tire yourself out.
There is certainly confusion present, but not on my end. The concept you’ve misunderstood is quite simple.
I haven’t misunderstood anything, you’re still confused.
Do you think Will Smith’s character can compose a symphony? Do you think third/no party voting actually stops fascists? If the first, you’ve misunderstood the meme. If the second, you’ve misunderstood reality.
I’m very proud of you for trying to understand the meme.
you should keep explaining it to yourself. maybe it’ll pay off?