not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to FuckMusk@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 month agoso much more expensive for the tax payer toolemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1739arrow-down137file-text
arrow-up1702arrow-down1imageso much more expensive for the tax payer toolemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to FuckMusk@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square69fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareZron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down3·1 month agoHow is it reusable if they all fail?
minus-squareatx_aquarian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoNot pictured (that’s called cherry-picking): Falcon 9 has 469 successful launches for a >99% success rate right now.
minus-squareZron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoFalcon 9 was designed by a different engineer who has since left SpaceX, and was originally intended to have a reusable second stage like Starship, but that never happened either.
minus-squareDogWater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoJust Google it before you speak lmao
How is it reusable if they all fail?
Not pictured (that’s called cherry-picking): Falcon 9 has 469 successful launches for a >99% success rate right now.
Falcon 9 was designed by a different engineer who has since left SpaceX, and was originally intended to have a reusable second stage like Starship, but that never happened either.
Just Google it before you speak lmao