The provision would bar courts from enforcing contempt citations for violations of injunctions or temporary restraining orders unless a bond has been paid.
On a lot of these anti-Trump injunctions, you’re starting to see a security bond of $1, exactly because of this.
If the one sentence is the entire statutory language, I don’t see anything that removes the judge’s existing discretion to require a nominal token bond.
On a lot of these anti-Trump injunctions, you’re starting to see a security bond of $1, exactly because of this.
If the one sentence is the entire statutory language, I don’t see anything that removes the judge’s existing discretion to require a nominal token bond.
I don’t understand. What does the token bond amount do?
It seems that an injunction with a token bond attached would still be enforceable under the proposed law.
There doesn’t seem to be anything in the provision that requires the security bond to be substantial.