• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So the bill contains a bunch of unconstitutional stuff, does the whole bill/law die in court, or just the parts that are unconstitutional?

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Just the unconstitutional parts. And the text stays on the books, just with a citation to the court case that says they’re unconstitutional.

      When the courts strike down a law, they have an obligation to keep as much of it intact as possible.

      Example: Affordable Care Act. The individual mandate was eliminated, but the marketplace, subsidies, medicaid expansion, and the preventive care stuff stayed in place.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I thought this was an option. But it is strange that we don’t have “line item veto” in the executive branch, but we evidently have it in the judicial branch.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    On a lot of these anti-Trump injunctions, you’re starting to see a security bond of $1, exactly because of this.

    If the one sentence is the entire statutory language, I don’t see anything that removes the judge’s existing discretion to require a nominal token bond.