The DNC cited a procedural concern, but Hogg said it is “impossible to ignore the broader context” of his criticisms.

  • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why wouldn’t a progressive want to vote blue though? Of the two most likely candidates, they are the least fascist.

    Unless you’re going the accelerationist route, it makes sense to Vote blue.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The DNC won’t improve things because their goal is to maintain the status quo

      With these actions they prove their goal is stagnation, not progress.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The DNC won’t improve things because…[bunch of nonsense]

        Why the fuck would you think that the DNC has the power to “improve things”? The DNC is no different from the RNC. Neither of them have any power at all over any branch of government. The 2 Dem organizations with 100% of the actual power to make laws are the HDC and the SDC.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I agree, but they are less fascist than the Republicans. So why not vote for them?

        • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Because they have proven they aren’t interested in meaningfully improving things…

          I want an option besides collapse and slow collapse lol

          • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I agree. We need time to build a leftist party or to fundamentally change the Democratic party. I’m not opposed to completely rewiring the Republican party if it’s a faster option.

            We can get more time by voting for the least fascist option. That way we won’t be sent off El Salvador while we’re trying to fix things.

            • btaf45@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 minutes ago

              We need time to build a leftist party

              There have been such attempts over the previous 120 years. They were all failures because of structural reasons.

              or to fundamentally change the Democratic party

              Yes that would be fantastic and definitely needs to happen. And it will happen sooner or later. The problem is that we need much more “sooner” and much less “later”. We only have so many years to live.

            • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I think the brands are too toxic at this point.

              Like 70% of people say they want more third parties that actually care about the things they do and don’t like the Duopoly.

              • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Yeah, I agree. I think first past the post has not been good. That’s what forces us into this two-party system.

                I would vote for a third party if it became more popular than the Democrats or the Republicans, and it was progressive/ leftist.

                The problem is getting it over that hump.

      • samus12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        That’s your problem, thinking you’re rewarding Democrats somehow by voting for them rather than doing damage mitigation for the country. They’re rich and will be fine regardless of who you vote for - you’re only making things worse for yourself by not voting for the lesser of two evils.

        • gobbles_turkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          You say “Thats your problem” like you think the DNC can win without these people you talk down to.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            You say “Thats your problem” like you think the DNC can win without these people you talk down to.

            It is our problem. You and me and everybody. Because we are the primary losers whenever the GOP wins elections. Not well to do politicians. They are going to be fine either way.

        • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          How? We’ve voted blue no matter who for decades and look where it got us.

          Maybe democrats should do something to earn our votes.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            We’ve voted blue no matter who for decades and look where it got us.

            30 million more people with health insurance? Raising taxes on billionaires instead of cutting them?

            Maybe democrats should do something to earn our votes.

            Nobody who voted for Harris were trying to do a f*cking personal favor for her. We were all trying to do ourselves and the country a favor. Some other person has to earn your right to permit you to do yourself a personal favor? The rest of us are simply claiming that right for ourselves because we would be fools not to.

          • samus12345@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            12 hours ago

            And if they don’t, who will be the ones suffering for it? It won’t be them.

              • samus12345@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                10 hours ago

                It’s more likely to be than letting fascists win, although a lot of work would have to be done primarying the corpos and getting progressives in there. That’s not even a possibility when the GOP has power.

                • resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  You don’t get it. YOU’RE letting the fascists win.

                  Progressive policies are broadly popular. Corporate democrats are less popular than the least popular president in American history.

                  • samus12345@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    No, voting for not-facists isn’t letting the fascists win. People voting for fascists and refusing to vote against them are. They may be doing it because the not-fascists suck, but the result is the same.

                  • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    People like you are the reason that we have a authoritarian fascist in power right now.

                    Well done. Fucking dipshit.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It doesn’t matter if the party doesn’t change. We can keep sleepwalking into it or crash into it, the result will be the same. We must change the Democratic party to avoid disaster.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I agree, but why not disempower the fascist as much as possible while rebuilding the Democratic party?

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The thing about voting for the “least fascist” is you’re still voting for a fascist.

      The energy is better spent preparing to remove the fascists. Get a gun, get organized with your community, build up shared resources, and prepare for the shoe to drop.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The thing about voting for the “least fascist” is you’re still voting for a fascist.

        Good thing I’m voting for a democrat and not a fascist then.

        Get a gun, get organized with your community, build up shared resources, and prepare for the shoe to drop.

        The thing about supporting a Communist overthrow of democracy is that you’re still supporting a Fascist overthrow of democracy with the same end result.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          For a capitalist party? Absolutely not. You’re giving them consent to govern on your behalf, and reinforcing their legitimacy.

          • btaf45@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            For a capitalist party? Absolutely not. You’re giving them consent to govern on your behalf, and reinforcing their legitimacy.

            I am glad you agree that consent is important. The Communists ruled Russia for 74 years without anybody’s consent, so I will assume you understand as all of us do that they are every bit as bad as their Fascist allies.

          • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            It grants you slower fascism rather than fast fascism.

            One day of voting for Democrats seems like it could prevent a lot of bad from happening. It’s a pretty good bang for your buck in terms of time spent organizing.

            As far as consent and legitimacy goes, that’s more of a media thing, not a voting thing.

            • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              You need to find a local socialist group to get involved with. Hopefully that will help deprogram you of the Democrat propaganda you’ve absorbed.

              If you get more involved, you’ll quickly realize that the Democrats are more active villains than you currently realize, and are the primary party we’re having to battle.

              • btaf45@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                you’ll quickly realize that the Democrats are more active villains than you currently realize, and are the primary party we’re having to battle.

                Wow you guys haven’t changed at all since 1917. This is a remarkable consistency for 108 years. Lenin and Stalin also saw their primary enemies as the other leftwing parties instead of the conservatives. They killed and/or imprisoned literally ever member of Russia’s other 2 socialist parties, the Menshiviks and the Socialist Revolutionary Party.

              • nutcase2690@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Already in the social labor party, but the restrictions of a 527 organization seem so… broken? The political party can’t endorse any specifc candidates, pay for campaign expenses, etc. You’d need a PAC for that.

                After all of those hurdles, the idea of a third party being viable across all states seem very far away, and with FPTP systems it is very unlikely that it would be able to do anything before people are put in camps for being LGBTQ+ or calling out fascists for what they are.

                • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  Considering the Democrats are moving even further to the right, I don’t understand your logic in thinking that continuing to vote for Democrats will solve any of those problems. As we’ve already seen, voting for Democrats isn’t even harm reduction. Biden armed a genocide, and deported 250% more people than Trump.

                  • nutcase2690@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    12 hours ago

                    That didn’t address any of my concerns, but okay…

                    Let me ask you this. How many significant “third parties” have gotten a significant number of votes in elections, in the 250 years that this country has been sovereign?

                    There was Roosevelt in 1912 with the progressive party that got most of his voters after splitting from republicans (supported largely by the north at the time). The [white supremacist] American Independent party in 1968 split off from the democrat party (at that time, supported largely by the south) The Independent party in 1992 split off from the republican party, and even though they got nearly a fifth of the popular vote, they didn’t get any electoral votes.

                    Historically, a third party has only gotten significant traction by infiltrating and then splitting off from a major party. Why would we not want to fracture this broken democrat party into something useful? We have the opportunity, and I firmly believe that the youth (once they start voting and getting on their feet enough to stand in this sea of shit that we find ourselves in) will make that move to split and reform the party to be something better.

                    I can understand not wanting to vote for someone who endorses some of the things you oppose (and some things that you might even be okay with!), but I do not understand still withholding that vote when the other option is someone whose actions repeatedly endorse ALL the things you oppose, but orders of magnitude worse.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Neoliberals are neither progressive nor leftist. They are protectors of right-wing ur-fascist policy. It’s past time we accept that the DNC is owned and operated by self-serving, rich neoliberal scum and start finding actual progressive, leftist alternatives.

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t disagree with anything there. I still don’t understand why you wouldn’t want to slow fascism down as much as possible. One day of voting seems like a pretty good deal for the outcome.

        You can both organize and vote.