• Gronk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Imagine being at war for literally over 90% of your societies existence and you don’t want half your population to have the ability to become combatants.

    F tier warrior race

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      There’s some –some—reason to not want women in front-line infantry positions. The combat load that infantry has to carry around works out to be over 100#, and it’s a struggle to get cis-men fit and strong enough to carry that, and still ruck 20+ miles at a time without collapsing. Most women are unlikely to be able to achieve that, particularly when they may weigh only 25# more than the load that they have to carry. But, IMO, as long as they can meet fitness standards, let 'em serve in the infantry if that’s what their ASVAB scores allow and it’s the MOS they want.

      Give that the new rifle–XM7, I think?–weighs more than the M5, and the ammunition is heavier, that load is gonna get heavier, and people that are more in-tune with the military than I am tend to believe that we need to get the combat load lighter, by a lot.

      Honestly, most of it really comes down to Pete Hegseth being sexist.