• jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    People building the yachts, and people operating them, are probably glad for the opportunity to divert some of the money to feeding, clothing, or treating, themselves and their families.

    The problem isn’t that billionaires spend money, the problem is that they don’t spend nearly enough.

    • Geodad@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 days ago

      They physically can’t spend it on themselves. There’s no possible way any one person can consume that much in a lifetime. The money need be forcibly redistributed to benefit society.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Funding organizations, be it businesses, foundations, charities, or whatever, can very quickly consume any amount of money you throw at them. There is literally no upper limit to how much you can pay people to do your bidding.

        • Geodad@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          The problem is that they won’t voluntarily, so we need to take it from them forcibly.

          • jarfil@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Well, yeah. There are literally billions of non-billionaires, only thing that’s needed is to join forces and stand up to them: strikes and taxes work wonders. The problem is most people would rather pick easier targets, and fight each other instead.

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Ah the old trickle down.

      How many lives would have been saved if the people working to build yachts and facilitating trips instead worked to feed the homeless or something?

      Humanity has a limited pool of labour. If the billionaires spent more, it means more labour catering to billionaires, less labour catering to the rest of us.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Jobs are limited, salaries are not, technology already amplifies work output way above everyone’s needs.

        Trickle down would work if it wasn’t for everyone undercutting everyone else: billionaires don’t get charged enough, millionaires don’t get charged enough, and people at the bottom keep trampling each other over minimum wage jobs.

        The solution starts with people at the bottom joining forces and saying “FU” to unlivable wages, as in unions and general strikes. As long as most people keep seeing each other as a threat, those at the top can play them at will.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Oh Hells no

      You’re describing trickle down economy and how billionaires always claim that they HAVE to be so rich because it will trickle down to everyone, I promise!

      Bullshit

      Give everyone good wages, which is possible, and give everyone a job.

      Have the billionaires pay up-to 100% income taxes and up to 50% owning taxes per year until their fortune is down to ~10 million, which is about the max that any human being should have. You cannot tell me that it’s really fine for someone to have 100.000.000.000 dollars net worth while kids are under the poverty level in the US. With all the taxed money, you can immediately give everyone a universe income with which we can all live normal human lives.

      Fuck these oligarchs, I sincerely they all die in an avalanche as that would actually make the world a better place. These people are leeches.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You’re describing trickle down economy

        Give everyone good wages, which is possible, and give everyone a job.

        give everyone a universe income

        Cognitive dissonance?

        BTW, it’s “Universal Basic Income”, the “net worth” is a fantasy, a “100% income tax” is as easy to dodge as any other, and wait for inflation to hit before talking about “the max that any human being should have”.

        I sincerely they all die

        This is where you’ve gone too far. Please think things through for a productive discussion.