Some thoughts/predictions about how open source developers will be forced to choose their path with GenAI.

Full disclaimer: my own post, sharing for discussion and to find out if anyone has any brilliant ideas what else could be done. It looks like self-posts are okay here but let me know if I’m wrong about that.

  • EnsignWashout@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The answer is 2.

    Cling to known humans who write their own code.

    Snake oil salesmen always encourage the public to bet against the experts, with predictable results.

    Someday ethically sourced AI can be used responsibly by trustworthy coders.

    But the key is choosing to collaborate with trustworthy coders.

    • thomask@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Do you think there’s a way for this to scale to larger projects like Servo? Or will it only work for a few people collaborating?

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yep. It does increasingly feel like developers like me who find it deeply disturbing and problematic for our profession and society are going to increasingly become rarer. Fewer and fewer people are going to understand how anything actually works.

      • limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I think nobody understands exactly how anything works, but enough of us understand our own little corner of tech to make new things and keep the older things going. I’ve been coding for decades, and proudly state I understand about 1% of what I do. This is higher than most

        AI will make these little gardens of knowledge smaller for most, and yet again we, as the human species, will forever rely on another layer of tech.