• Gregoryy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Those numbers are way off. Germany has over 100 GW installed in PV. There is no way that those numbers listed here are right.

  • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I was curious, so here’s the numbers in relation to land area (MW/1000 km^2). Based on are found in Wikipedia.

    • China: 46.7
    • USA: 12.3
    • India: 21.9
    • Japan: 82.0
    • Spain: 55.3
    • Germany: 72.6
    • Brazil: 0.22
    • France: 19.0
    • Australia: 1.56
    • UK: 36.9

    Edit: corrected the unit.

    • Coffee Junky ❤️@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Per capita the Netherlands should definitely be in the list

      In 2023, the Netherlands was the country with the highest PV capacity per capita in Europe with 1,299Wp. Worldwide, only Australia had a higher capacity per capita.

      I can’t really find the per 1000 km² when I try to calculate it I get 595 MW/1000 km^2

      Maybe its somewhat correct, chatgpt gives me this

      To find the solar power generated per 1000 km² in the Netherlands in MW, we need to know the total installed solar capacity and the land area of the Netherlands.

      Here’s how we can estimate it:

      1. Current Solar Capacity in the Netherlands

      As of 2024, the Netherlands had approximately 22,000 MW (or 22 GW) of installed solar capacity.

      1. Land Area of the Netherlands

      The total land area is about 41,500 km².

      1. Solar Capacity per 1000 km²

      \text{Capacity per 1000 km²} = \left( \frac{22,000 \text{ MW}}{41,500 \text{ km²}} \right) \times 1000 \approx 530 \text{ MW per 1000 km²}

      Final Answer:

      Approximately 530 MW of solar capacity per 1000 km² in the Netherlands.

      Let me know if you’d like to calculate actual solar energy generation (e.g., MWh/year) instead of capacity.

      • Coffee Junky ❤️@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        Per capita the Netherlands should definitely be in the list

        In 2023, the Netherlands was the country with the highest PV capacity per capita in Europe with 1,299Wp. Worldwide, only Australia had a higher capacity per capita.

        I can’t really find the per 1000 km² when I try to calculate it I get 595 MW/1000 km^2 (I used the 2023 number, it had more sunny days than 2024)

        Maybe its somewhat correct, chatgpt gives me this

        To find the solar power generated per 1000 km² in the Netherlands in MW, we need to know the total installed solar capacity and the land area of the Netherlands.

        Here’s how we can estimate it:

        1. Current Solar Capacity in the Netherlands

        As of 2024, the Netherlands had approximately 22,000 MW (or 22 GW) of installed solar capacity.

        1. Land Area of the Netherlands

        The total land area is about 41,500 km².

        1. Solar Capacity per 1000 km²

        \text{Capacity per 1000 km²} = \left( \frac{22,000 \text{ MW}}{41,500 \text{ km²}} \right) \times 1000 \approx 530 \text{ MW per 1000 km²}

        Final Answer:

        Approximately 530 MW of solar capacity per 1000 km² in the Netherlands.

        Let me know if you’d like to calculate actual solar energy generation (e.g., MWh/year) instead of capacity.

        I also asked for actual generated 482 MW per 1000KM²

        • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Yea It’s per km^2, divided by 1000. I just dropped the last 3 digits off the area when doing the calculation. I just tried to make readable units.

  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Zach Galifianakis Math meme

    By “solar power in operation” (in GW) i think they mean maximum output capacity rather than actual production, since these numbers add up to 923 GW while wikipedia says in 2024 there was 2.13 petawatt-hours (243 GW on average) actually produced by solar.

    wikipedia screenshot with pie chart. 2024 world electricity generation by source. Total generation was 30.85 petawatt-hours. Coal 10,587 (34.4%), Natural gas 6,796 (22.1%), Hydro 4,417 (14.4%), Nuclear 2,765 (8.99%), Wind 2,497 (8.12%), Solar 2,130 (6.92%),
Other 1,569 (5.10%)

    • suoko@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Yes, GW Is maximum output while GWh Is actual production. You can have a 1GW power plant, but without sun you might have 0 GWh.

  • kossa@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I find the thought hilarious, that the UK just switched their entire soil for PV and are like “why do we get only 9 GW out of it 😭?”, like ☁️☁️☁️🌧️

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They turned off there nuclear after Fukushima, fossil fuels have always been expensive for them so solar makes a lot of sense.

        • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The latter seems like all the more reason to have more people per km² buying solar panels, no?

          Also, more divided than Germany? How so?

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Well it’s made up of four distinct islands in a sort of stretched out chain whereas Germany is more a big block of land in the middle of a continent (depending on your preferred definition of what that is).

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They have the most solar power per area as far as I understand it. So good utilization!

  • Z3k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m not sure if i should be impressed or sad that the UK is on that list given how small we are in terms of population and land area.

    • Deebster@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sad because the UK’s quite small/unsunny and that means most other countries aren’t doing much?

      I thought that the UK was quite strong in wind, so it’d be interesting to see that charted.

    • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I’m pretty impressed, considering both our land area and population, there’s about 40x more space in the us and another 240,000 or so people. China and the US are 3rd and 4th largest respectively in terms of land, 2nd and 3rd in population and 2nd and 1st by GDP

      We’re 80th and 22nd in area and people, and while we’re 6th in global GDP, that’s still 1/10th of the US’s.
      I’d like the square to be bigger, but the graphic would look a lot different if it was total renewable power, renewable as a percentage of total power, or even simply wind, as being an island we lean toward wind far more than China and the US. Maybe OP can give us those statistics as graphics?

      • Z3k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        My coment wasn’t the clearest was it. I’m over it with the UK while disappointed that much larger places don’t even show. We shouldn’t be that hard to push off the info graphic with the area constraints we have

    • suoko@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      That’s what I thought too, but think of the drop in the number of needed politicians, we’d cut so many useless people that it would sound incredible to most of us