cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/32712724

Hungary launched an anti-EU campaign featuring Zelenskyy and EU leaders, vetoes Ukraine military aid, blocks declarations, and spreads disinformation about Ukrainian migrants.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/04/20/eu-considers-stripping-hungary-of-voting-rights-over-ukraine-obstruction/


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

  • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    turns out building your supranational union on the basis of unanonimous votes for everything was a shit idea if you ever wanted to get anything done as that supranational union. Who’d’ve thunk it

    • atro_city@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Only 19 of the 26 countries are on board. It’ll need more work to get a unanimous vote. But with Romania being pro-Russia and having Hungary’s back, that’s not happening. The most likely thing to happen is making the membership of Hungary in the EU useless or a net negative to them. For example if all EU funds were blocked, Hungary would have a huge problem.

        • Owl@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          EVERYTHING in hungary is built of the leftovers of the EU money

          Those little breadcrums that Orbán and his entourage don’t steal are everything

        • atro_city@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m pretty sure missing billions of euros to invest businesses and Hungarian infrastructure would be a problem for Hungary.

    • rogermiraki@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Every democracy in the world works on the basis of majority votes, not unanimous. Why should the EU be different?

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If everyone else votes the same except you, then your opinion IS less valuable.

      If you keep doing that over and over on important issues just to blockade everything, others will get annoyed with you. Especially if you play into the hands of imperialist countries like Russia.

          • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            It looks like theyre supposed to have a right to vote whatever they understand that they should vote. The fact that they are banned when they do so seems contradictory

            • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              It does not, considering the suspension of voting rights is a process every member has agreed to existing.

              A member state who goes rogue, who acts in the interest of foreign nations and not in the interest of the collective can, should and must have its voting rights suspended. The protection and continued existence of the union takes precedence over any individual nation’s voting rights.

              There is no contradiction here. Suspending voting rights exists explicitly because there is no right to vote for whatever you want.

              • FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                There is no contradiction here. Suspending voting rights exists explicitly because there is no right to vote for whatever you want.

                Whats even the point of voting then?

                • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  To see what the majority of voters want, not pander to one or two of them only.

                • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  To arrive at a mutual consensus. That’s what the point of voting has always been.

                  Suspending a malicious actor’s voting rights does not violate this. In fact, it is required to do so. See the paradox of tolerance which goes into some more detail.