• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then don’t post your art or face publicly, I agree with you if it’s obtained through malicious ways, but if you post it publicly than expect it to be used publicly

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you post your art publicly why should it be legal for Amazon to take it and sell it? You are deluding yourself if you believe AI having a get out of jail free card on IP infringement won’t be just one more source of exploitation for corporations.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Taking it and selling it is obviously not legal, but taking it and using it for training data is a whole different thing.

        Once a model has been trained the original data isn’t used for shit, the output the model generates isn’t your artwork anymore it isn’t really anybody’s.

        Sure, with some careful prompts you can get the model to output something in your style fairly closely, but the outputting image isn’t yours. It’s whatever the model conjured up based on the prompt in your style. The resulting image is still original of the model

        It’s akin to someone downloading your art, tracing it over and over again till they learn the style and then going off to draw non-traced original art just in your style

        • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          “You don’t understand, it’s not infringement because we put it in a blender first” is why AI “art” keeps taking Ls in court.