The stock market just crashed by 2 trillion! This is the Republican Recession folks!

  • iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Very confusing! Is this a good thing or not?

    Lemmy always tells me that billionairs get rich by stealing from the poor.

    As the rich got a lot poorer today, did the poor now get richer? Hooray for trump for reducing wealth inequality?

      • iii@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If that’s true, we can expect businesses to not be affected, and stock prices to remain stable

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            If it’s not good for business, then that’s not good for the stockowners. Which is mostly the rich.

            If the rich loose money, then the poor get richer?

            • Hylactor@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              2 days ago

              If gas tanks were money, and you are worth $100K, let’s say your car has a 20 gallon gas tank, a billionaire would have a 200,000 gallon gas tank. Think of these terrifs as something that harms “gas mileage”. The guy with a 200,000 gallon tank may care, but realistically poor gas mileage is never going to effect their quality of life like it will us regular folks.

            • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              Money is very rarely transferred from the rich to the poor. When the rich lose money it’s going to other rich people or corporations.

            • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              The price of groceries goes up, but the price of luxury goods is relatively unaffected. So, for example, the price of a yacht will go up by how much more it costs to fill it’s fridge…

    • criitz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      When the market is up, the rich reap the benefits. When the market is down, the poor pay the price.

    • chaos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s possible for the rich and poor to both suffer. Of course, when the rich “suffer” that mostly means they can’t have all the new things they want and have to settle for the excess they already have. When the poor suffer, they’re devastated and unable to live a decent life.

      (Yes, the rich get richer by stealing from the poor. A worker at Amazon causes $N to be paid to the company from her efforts, but Amazon will pay her less than $N so they can make money. The difference goes to the rich, whose only contribution was having their name on the paperwork. Billions and billions of dollars flowing toward people who are doing, at best, hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of actual work themselves. There aren’t enough hours in the day to earn the money these people are raking in. It should be going to the people actually doing the work.)

      • vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s worse than that even, it’s not that they can’t have all the new things they wants etc. they still get all that, their only “suffering” is that their magic high score number goes up at a slower rate, or goes down a little. They (billionaires) see no effective impact of any of this.