- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or register to comment.
Why kill an innocent employee and not a scum fuck executive?
Unfortunately, not every politically inspired copycat is, you know, not crazy.
Executives rarely visit Madera county CA
Three possibilities immediately come to mind:
a. The accused in the other well-known case was extremely bright, had access to the best education, while this person was not and did not.
b. It was a personal grudge but it sounded good plus a glory grab.
c. He’s mentally unwell and/or overindulged, while also not being extremely bright.
Disclaimer; I’m a random on the internet and this is wild speculation, so none of those could apply.
Those who are mentally well, smart and diligent enough, to know how to effectively locate and kill a CEO are usually also mentally well and smart enough to know better.
Those with the motive rarely have the means, and those with the means rarely have the motive.
Not killing a CEO is better?
Know better than to commit murder. There are some pretty major consequences if you’re convicted.
There are consequences to not killing a CEO now and then too.
For the same reason that massive dudes with cauliflower ears, broken noses, and calloused knuckles are rarely the victims of these supposed “psychos”, they’re cowards.
Dude it already sucks magnum dong working at a pharmacy. Can you imagine clocking into that hell just to get blasted by some degenerate moron just because he cant get xandy bars?
Who doesn’t
