Modelling of how Trump’s tariffs will hit global trade suggests the US will be the biggest loser – while a few nations may emerge as surprising winners.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://theconversation.com/new-modelling-reveals-full-impact-of-trumps-liberation-day-tariffs-with-the-us-hit-hardest-253320


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

    • dryfter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      > Fuck

      That’s an understatement, more like

      spoiler

      image

      Forget about a recession, the U.S. is headed directly towards a possible depression and bringing Canada down with it if those numbers are even remotely true. That’s almost 1-2 months salary wiped out for 1/3 of households in the US when most of those people are living paycheck to paycheck.

    • TaldenNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      If we’re very quiet precious, my love, maybe he won’t notice us down here near the bottom of the table.

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Aha! Trump is secretly doing the bidding of the Kiwis! No, not New Zealanders, not even the bird… it’s the fruit’s fault!

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t understand why some countries get a gain from additional tariffs.

      The article doesn’t explain the mechanism.

      Some nations gain from the trade war. Typically, these face relatively low US tariffs (and consequently also impose relatively low tariffs on US goods). New Zealand (0.29%) and Brazil (0.28%) experience the largest increases in GDP. New Zealand households are better off by $397 per year.

      • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        My unfounded guess is that they sell products that normally compete with a soon to be crippled US market, so their products can fill the void. Think car sales from China to the EU after the tarrifs cripple manufacturing, for example.

      • shirro@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Australia’s top 3 export markets are China, South Korea and Japan. If they put retaliatory tariffs on the US we should pick up extra business as we will have a price advantage. When the US duped our old conservative PM, Scummo, into pissing of China they put up trade barriers and our “mates” including Canada, NZ and USA all gained at our expense. It’s nothing personal.

        We don’t export much to the US and 10% is as low as it goes. Without retaliation the US tariffs would only be a tax on US consumers. But the retaliation from other large economies will damage US exports and jobs and give opportunities to other nations. Thanks, I guess.

        • veroxii@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Also Australia is actually trading at a deficit with the USA. We buy way more from them than they buy from us. Which shows this narrative of Trump to reduce the trade deficit is bullshit.

          For this reason though I don’t think Australia will do retaliatory tariffs. Why hurt ourselves more when the USA is less than 5% of our exports?

      • subignition@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think it is because countries impacted the least by new tariffs are most likely to have new trade with OTHER countries affected more heavily by the tariffs.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If country A is tariffed 20% and country B is tariffed 10%; that mean country B have an advantage against country A and can get some of the marked A is losing.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe they already had some sort of tariff? Maybe it modifies the existing trade deal somehow? Idk I’m not an economist just a peasant.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Aside from fossil fuels, they mostly only trade with China, right? They’re kinda “isolated” like Best Korea.

          • Sanctus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Can’t be hit when you aren’t even trading. They’ll probably see video games get more expensive on Steam

              • Sanctus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Thats probably a definite unless China is willing to absorb the cost for whatever reason. They seem to be in a generous mood (relatively, terms and conditions apply) ever since Trump soured the world to the US.