retired healthcare IT programmer/analyst, supporter of Palestine, Cuban Revolution, women’s rights, FOSS, Linux, Black Lives Matter. Live in Michigan, USA


Thanks for responding. Could you send a screenshot of how and where you get to that? I have explored quite a bit and haven’t found that. Thanks.


deleted by creator


Reuters has begun a paywall, and I didn’t know if a direct link would encounter issues for the readers.


Thanks for pointing that out. I just deleted the confusing link and left in the one that I wanted everyone to see. (see below)

___


What specifically are you talking about? The people mentioned in the article are true right-wing Jew-haters, not defenders of Palestine. And the publication has a consistent record of anti-Zionism.


Sorry, it’s working now.


Did you try the archive link in the comment section? It should be working.


I’ve been reading a lot of articles from 972, and I don’t see evidence of that. Do they explicitly call for the destruction of the Zionist state? No, but that doesn’t make 972 a liberal Zionist rag. (In fact, their latest issue explicitly takes on liberal Israelis on the Gaza genocide.)
If you have some examples where they took bad positions on something concrete, please send them to me. I could be wrong.


Sure, no problem.


Ilana Glazer happens to be in the center of the photo.

Yes, but there was an archive link below.


You’re welcome, thanks for letting me know!


??


I don’t understand your logic here. Clearly, the kid had problems that were not caused by ChatGPT. And his suicidal thoughts were not started by ChatGPT. But OpenAI acknowledged that the longer the engagement continues the more likely that ChatGPT will go off the rails. Which is what happened here. At first, ChatGPT was giving the standard correct advice about suicide lines, etc. Then it started getting darker, where it was telling the kid to not let his mother know how he was feeling. Then it progressed to actual suicide coaching. So I don’t think the analogy to videogames is correct here.


That was not my headline, it was the publication’s headline, which was quoting from the Israeli officer. Yes, I didn’t like it either, so I just removed it from the main headline and replaced it with the one from Haaretz. I can’t fix the subheadline.


You’re welcome, thanks for letting me know!


Well, thank you for writing that! I really appreciate you taking the time! And I’m glad that you like them. :-)
Thanks. I thought I had a valid archive, but I clearly didn’t.