In that case I stand corrected on the whole orbit bit. Thanks for taking the time.
In that case I stand corrected on the whole orbit bit. Thanks for taking the time.
I didn’t say “a little” money. It may be important or critical for the business but from a technical perspective, demonstrating how it can safely bring loads up and down decides whether the whole concept is actually feasible. That’s when people will start to get excited.
As far as I understood it, SpaceX uses the word “orbit” liberally. If it reaches the hight where an orbit would be possible, that’s “being in orbit” for them. In an actual orbit, the rocket would not fall back down again in an hour or so without active breaking. If my understanding is incorrect, I’m happy to be corrected. And even of that was achieved soon, it’s still all without demonstrating that the starship could actually carry a load and return it safely. Not even an inexpensive dummy load. All SpaceX is showing in their live feeds are empty cargo holds that fill up with hot gases and fumes during reentry.
I think the average person gets it right. It’s a nice feat to catch the booster and it will save money. But that’s a side quest. The main quest of getting an actual load to orbit and beyond is still pretty far away. At least compared with the official time line where they wanted to achieve much more than that three years ago.
And whoever is way up his ass, is also a racist climate change denier. (Or has that changed in the last decade or so that I wouldn’t watch these shows?)
Termination without notice in Germany? That’s a major challenge even in situations that warrant it.
Wer darf denn so eine allgemeine, Gesetze unterwandernde Ausnahmegenehmigung ausstellen? Habt ihr wenigstens Ausgleichszeiten dafür oder ist das eine einseitige Streichung?
EDIT: alles klar, Eigentor:
Ebenso gibt es die Möglichkeit für Tarifvertragsparteien gemäß § 7 Abs.1 ArbZG (sog. Tariföffnungsklausel), die Ruhezeit um bis zu zwei Stunden zu kürzen, wenn die Art der Arbeit dies erfordert und die Kürzung innerhalb eines festzulegenden Zeitraums ausgeglichen wird.
Ansible playbook is perfect for this. All your configuration is repeatable, whether on a running system or a new one. Plus you can start with a completely fresh newest version image and apply from there, instead of starting from a soon-to-be outdated custom image.
It states the OpenStreetMap data is from May. Is it fully offline and needs to wait for the next app update?
This sounds an awful lot like victim blaming. It’s the responsibility of the museum to clearly communicate how the attraction should be used. For example by signage if it should only be used below a certain weight or age. There are plenty of examples of this with attractions elsewhere, so it’s not as if that’s remotely surprising or an undue burden or anything.
He always has to return to class because of those DUIs.
Thanks for such an enjoyable App!
Postgres handles NoSQL better than many dedicated NoSQL database management systems. I kept telling another team to at least evaluate it for that purpose - but they knew better and now they are stuck with managing the MongoDB stack because they are the only ones that use it. Postgres is able to do everything they use out of the box. It just doesn’t sound as fancy and hip.
Also, Kanban was invented in the 40s as a process for automotive production lines. That’s why it aligns so well with maintenance and operations projects in IT. It’s ridiculous how more and more people claim it comes from software development and would not fit hardware projects, when that’s the core use case of the methodology.
Modern browsers happily show you the actual characters, while sending their encoded entities to the server. So, from a user perspective there is no ASCII limitation. Case in point: söhne.at (just some random website, I have no idea what they are or if they are legitimate)
That would work with someone who argues fairly. But with someone, who has the super weapon of “they don’t want you to know, so they hide those cases”, you won’t get far.
Sure, there were electric cars. But if I remember correctly, Tesla was the first to deliver the whole next-gen package with an every day, everywhere car, plus charging stations plus the whole automation. If you wanted that, there was no way around Tesla for quite a while.
Teslas were the “best”, as in the only option for what they did. They were never the “best”, as in better than existing products for what they did.
Being first to market for such a long time was an incredible feat and it speaks volumes that their position isn’t much, much stronger at the end of it.
No, I said they hadn’t demonstrated it. But 95% is close enough, I stand corrected.