• Fisk400@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are basically corporate accounts that are payed to be bigots online. You are looking at literal astroturf and asking why it doesn’t feel like grass.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a place with first past the post voting, two parties will dominate and then it does become a sports game.

      Two player games are fundamentally different than three or more player games, in terms of which strategies are optimal to win.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        All the well spoken amoral greedy fuckers know exactly where to go to maximize their personal upsides from those “skills” in a system where power alternates between only two political parties.

        Power Duopolies created through mathematical rigging of representative allocation systems are better than outright One Party systems but not by much and certainly not Democratic or in any way close to representative of the entire interests and beliefs of millions of human beings.

        I’ve actually lived in countries with FPTP and with Proportional Vote and the way the latter countries are managed is vastly better than the former and even public discourse a lot more produtive.

    • BenShapiro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am only on a platform “for something” if that “something” is AOC. Purely for professional reason.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      After over 3 decades of voting, across 3 countries, even having held beliefs all the way from what I though was “communism” (when I was little more than a kid) through neoliberalism and finally settling down to a sort of social democracy (shaped by and subservient to my principles) and having even been involved in a supposedly thinking leftwing party around here I would stay that mindless tribalism is exactly what almost the entirety of politics is nowadays.

      The whole “building your on political beliefs starting from your core principles upwards, and always keeping them in mind” thing is very unusually: normally (even in that supposedly “thinking” people party) it’s all about choosing sides, growing an emotional bond with your side and then just blindly waving the team’s flag and unskeptically take in and parrot whatever your side’s celebrities says as if they’re unchallangeable truths delivered down all the way from the gods.

      In fact I’m pretty pissed from discovering that most people in even that party of supposedly thinking people are little more than clubist political parrots. It does however explain why so many measures people parrot as the right thing to do are actually one-sided and in practice not anchored in the principles we’re told they’re suppose to promote, sometime even de facto going against them: when people are unskeptical unthinking fans of the team, they’re really easy to lead by the nose by womever captures the leadership positions on that team, an sometimes said leaders aren’t even purposefully manipulative, they’re just nowere as bright as their small-pond celebrity status makes them think and generally have ridiculously narrow life experience and hence don’t really know much about how the World works outside their tiny tiny bubble.

    • s_s@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Politics isn’t football, you don’t pick your team and have to let everyone know about it.

      It’s a preservation strategy for failed ideologies.

      • Aceticon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Mainstream parties, which are pretty much ideology-free (or as their top people often call it: “pragmatic”) also relly heavilly on clubism, so I think cultivating fans not partners it’s a much more widespread strategy than merely only for the “standardized political slogan packs” which are ideologies (failed or otherwise).

  • Bingohas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy shit, they launched Threads pre-enshittified. Massive time saver if you ask me.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suspect they had to jump on it when Elon shat the bed over the weekend. Suckerberg probably saw that disasterpiece and was like “quick, spit-shine the dev build and go live!”

    • Hexagon@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’re only halfway through 2023, but I already decided to make “enshittification” word of the year for me.

      Actually, screw that! Make it word of the decade!

  • Grant_M@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Threads is already banned in Europe and won’t withstand the scrutiny of Federation. Too many bigots. I’m certain Zuck doesn’t care either way. The thing is set up as an advertising medium for the GOP. Same old Cambridge Analytica scheme repeating.

  • pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly apps like Threads and Twitter should just be a containment site for these types of people. Let them be…

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Time and time again, it has been proven that “absolute free speech” online just attracts the absolute worst kind of people.

    I did expected them to fail immediately, but this is way funnier than I expected. They either need to start banning immediately and start throwing money at celebs to use Threads, otherwise no one mainstream will ever advertise there.

    • Thorosofbeer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      You mean the non-heavily moderated platforms allow for discussion on topics you care about by people who disagree with you.

      • TrinityTek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except much like your comment, they aren’t actually trying to have a good faith discussion.

  • Artair Geal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Absolutely no surprise there. When you keep the barrier to entry low and throw in an algorithm to increase “engagement” via outrage, the soup turns to poison quickly.

    This is why every time someone says the Fediverse is “too confusing,” I just smile and nod. That attitude of petulant, lazy, self-imposed gatekeeping is what’s keeping the Fediverse a much nicer place to be.

    • shinjiikarus@mylem.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the “hot” and “active” filters continue to work as expected and bots get reasonably moderated or blocked, I don’t even think Lemmy needs a high barrier to entry or petulance. The most important thing is to not optimize any recommendation or sorting algorithm on session duration, ads seen before closing session, and revenue per user.

      • spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This is so true and people seem to have a really hard time seeing this. The cultures on other social sites are far more manufactured than we’d like to believe. I think the human driven systems of Lemmy and Mastodon are brilliant but the true killer feature of the fediverse is going to be an open content recommendation algorithm. A collectively developed non-profit driven algorithm would undoubtedly be better at surfacing positive impact content than either system.

        • 3rdBlueWizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Can we use ai to judge emotional content of threads so I can get recommendations for threads where people are relaxed and happy?

          • OutrageousUmpire@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Actually yes and I don’t think it’s a bad idea. Sentiment analysis is not a hard task nowadays. If overused the site would become a bunch of artificial positivity, but I think there could be a place for this. Could be part of a mod toolkit too.

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d imagine if it uses the sentiment as a weight but not a gate when selecting what content to boost that would probably provide a good balance. Especially if you get some controls to adjust the weights in the settings panel

            • Veltoss@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I definitely don’t think something like that should be used to only show one emotion though. If AI were used to control content based on how it makes people feel it should try to balance, not control how we feel. Give us an equal amount of everything.

              It’s not good to cloak ourselves in only feelgood stories and lies that sound nice and ignore all the bad stuff just because an algorithm wants us to feel nice and cozy. If no one cares about the bad stuff, the bad stuff gets worse.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yesterday it was bugged on world, too. I’d keep hitting next page and seeing half of the same things on every page. It’s working better today though.

          • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s been noted on the GitHub. It seems the bug is amplified on small instances. I’ll regularly get posts from two weeks ago with no comments on the top of All/Hot when using this account.

    • GreenCrush@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      This this this. The fediverse being “confusing” keeps the idiots, boomers, trolls, and overall horrible people away. Having to learn something new is too much for those people. Lemmy/Mastodon and so on are “nerd” platforms, and I really like it that way.

      • Shifty McCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Easy on the boomer stuff. You just lumped “horrible people” into the same group as regular people that happen to have lived more years than you. If you are looking for a “nerd” platform, you’ll do well to remember that there are a ton of extremely nerdy boomers out there and you just helped turn the soup to poison for them

        • Erk@cdda.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          IRC is hugely flawed but also, I miss it. Could we have a federated discord? It’d basically be irc but easier to find stuff right?

          • Veltoss@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Man I’d love that. I feel like we will soon honestly. I just hope the lemmy/Kbin apps bring these other federated projects inside, so we can do it all on one app too.

              • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Wasn’t IRC itself pretty much federated, just maybe not calling it that yet? Networked I think they called it. You’d have a bunch of servers in a network and users could join channels and chat with users on other networks. Every now and then you’d get a server split where some subset of servers would lose connection with the rest and a bunch of people would all leave the channel at once. Then, it would resolve, and they’d come flooding back in.

                • marx2k@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes. For example, you’d have a collection of servers that federated to create EFnet. DaLnet, etc. Joining any of those servers would get you onto that federated network. You could be banned from one server but you could always choose another to still get into the same network. And yes, netsplits happened. A lot.

    • HamnavoePer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s concerning just how many people can’t be bothered to spend 5 minutes to pick an instance… Keeps it nicer for us though

      • Nepenthe@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really think it’s fair to pretend that, before two weeks ago, anyone under god had any idea what an instance was unless they were already heavily tech-oriented.

        It took me hours of trying to read through not-my-kind-of-jargon to understand what the hell I was looking at and what kind of consequences that unexplained choice would have, and it really seems like a good number of users that initially struggled forget the learning curve extremely quickly the moment they’re over it.

          • valek879@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was a case of: Lemmy.ml isn’t accepting new users atm BeeHaw requires me to tell them why I’m a good user So does this other instance… Why do I have to justify myself!? Hey, Lemmy.world let’s me just sign up! Perfect!

            And that was how I chose an instance. Thank you for joining story got with Valek

          • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Decision paralysis is real even for stupid things. Like, “what are the implications if I pick the wrong instance?” Was something that made me put off finishing signing up for mastodon and I’m not embarrassed to admit it. Acting like it’s trivial isn’t helpful to anyone even if it was trivial or you

            • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah decision paralysis definitely delayed my joining any ActivityPub based sites, but really most of what it affects is stuff that wont matter until you’ve spent enough time on the platform to understand the difference to begin with

            • marx2k@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Same here. I had no idea what picking an insurance meant in terms of the amount of people, communities, level of engagement, etc.

              I could have picked one of the more toxic communities that have been defederated and my experience of lemmy would have been much worse

        • Sarsaparilla@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It took me hours of trying to read through not-my-kind-of-jargon to understand

          I started off going down that road of trying to understand it, but my laziness and impatience got in the way and said “just start using it and you’ll work it out.” And that’s exactly what happened for me. In a way, the explanations made it all sound much more confusing than it really is. Sometimes you just gotta take a deep breath and dive in.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve been explaining it like email. There’s no email webpage you go to to create an account. It’s just a protocall a bunch of people have agreed to use, so you go to one of them and you create an address. I also think your username in the fediverse should be called an address too, but I don’t think that’ll catch on. It makes it a lot easier to explain, because everyone can use email, even the most tech illiterate people.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been explaining it like email

          Maybe I’m setting the bar too low but a lot of people have no clue if their emailing, texting or messaging. They just know that their phone pings and they can either reply or not. I learned this when I worked support for a smartphone manufacturer

    • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My first instinct would be to say, “This is the 21st century, learn to use a damn computer already!” But then I think of the long term and WANT people to think it’s too hard to join Mastodon or Kbin, just to keep the average IQ of these sites above room temperature.

      • Poplar?@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        IMO if technical difficulty is the filter, it would actually only select for people good at computers. There are otherwise dumb, shallow people who are good at tech.

        (I’m not saying its difficult using lemmy, just replying to the idea in general)

    • sgtlighttree@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If extra layer of “difficulty” is introduced by giving the users the choice of an instance is enough to keep them away, then I’m all for it.

      It just needs to be easier for the ones that managed to figure it all out (better apps, stability, UI/UX, and QOL updates)

      IMO the only algorithm I’ll accept for lemmy/kbin is slightly faster “expiration” for posts, sometimes some posts stay too long on my frontpage.

    • Anony Moose@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well said! A high barrier to entry, and a low barrier to exit working as intended. Let’s enjoy the good times while they last.

    • animist@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely agree. I love the high barrier to entry and how it has kept the conversations (for the most part) more substantial.

      • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know I’m an old school techie, but was there really a high entry bar for lemmy compared to say twitter or Instagram? I honestly don’t know, other than r3dd!t the last social media I signed up for was what? Facebook well over a decade ago?

        If the few steps it took to make a user name, pick an instance, and then get my head around the fact that I had to also join any instance I wanted to respond to, is enough to keep the unwashed internet masses out, well, they are just even dumber than I already thought.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I dove into Lemmy and Mastadon with very little research and even Mastodon with its “pick an instance you like first” step was extremely easy. I ended up on smaller instances for both and honestly I like it. Best part is, if you feel some FOMO either make another account on another instance or in the case of Mastadon export your account and migrate it to the new instance

        • olimario@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Many people genuinely give up at the “pick an instance” stage.

          Part of it is a slight failing for not blasting “if you join any of these instances you can respond to posts on any of these imstances’ communities” but also the level of tech literacy has fallen off of a cliff post-smartphone world.

          Bolstering technology literacy (I’m talking simple things like: what is a file browser, where do things you download go by default, what are some common file types for music/videos/applications) need to be added to public education because there’s clearly a decline happening here that will have downstream ramifications.

          • Sentinian@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say it’s less so a decline and moreso a lack of literacy to begin with. The number of relatives I have that are fucking stupid with the internet is insane. And surprise the kids are just as stupid with tech, since the parents are dumb and companies made tools for them and the kids.

          • Weirdfish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I used to think the next generation was going to out code, design, and trouble shoot me in five years, and that the one after that would make me feel like a dinosaur in my 30s.

            Now I’m almost 50, and the army of tech savvy teens coming for my job simple hasn’t materialized. With the ease of use of so many devices, a world where “plug and play” actually exists, the effort and skill requirement for most things has gone way down. On top of that, the battle for attention is so great that there is always something easier to go play with, and if it requires a bit of noodling to make it work, screw it.

            For a bit I thought “Great, job security!”, but now I’m at the point where I need to think about finding interns and replacements, and unless they come from one of the historic tech pipelines like PC gaming or the makers community, not a lot of kids have that kind of background.

            There are great programs now in the schools for making app, 3D printing, graphics, music, etc, that draw kids into technology. However, like everything else it’s all slick and user friendly. You don’t have to spend hour after hour figuring out how to make the thing work.

            I watched my two year old nephew trying to swipe on the pictures in a magazine and was confused why they didn’t move. He was basically born with an ipad in his hands.

            I agree completely that a basic computer class covering those things and more should be standard in schools. Now we have niche tech courses akin to the woodshop and autos class of my high school, but they are electives, and don’t cover the fundamentals.

        • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Non-techy guy here. I read an infograohic and made an account. 0 issues whatsoever. And the infographic was just to help me understand how it works. You don’t really need to understand lemmy to interact with it

  • edgytofu@lemmy.oneB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zuck is going to make it real friendly so it’s gonna be nice and safe for advertisers

  • Rhabuko@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah I see it has already became a toxic shit hole. Need the toxic people for that sweet rage engagement.

  • OwenEverbinde@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe we’ll finally be cool enough to get banned - Klanned Karenhood

    Oh, you could have been that cool already. Just do as Ijeoma Oluo did.

    1. Provoke the racists. They will come flooding into your inbox with death threats.

    2. Report the messages to Meta so they can say, “doesn’t violate our community standards.”

    3. Screenshot the messages and Meta’s enabling response, and post them publicly on your Facebook page to show how seriously Meta takes right-wing death threats and hate speech.

    Done. Banned “for posting hate speech.” You could have been cool all along, Klanned Karenhood. You just have to go after the right people.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        They also have no interest in removing spam and scams. Every time I log in to check in on family that doesn’t believe any form of contact exists outside of Facebook, I end up reporting at least 3 posts in the five minute period that I’m there for being spam/scam posts in groups

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Same on Twitter. Back pre-Elron I was suspended for the stupidest crap: I said I thought Trump would be too old to run for office next year, as he lived an unhealthy lifestyle. That was “wishing harm or violence”, like, what? I didn’t voice an opinion about whether I was all happy about that or something, just simply made that statement. Then someone was joking about the Will Smith thing and something about Kid Rock and I said Hillary Clinton should be the one to slap Kid Rock. That was also horribly violent of me. I appealed and they said NO, YOu are VERY BAD, SORRY. What a waste of time. It’s offensive, too. Meanwhile I’ve reported things like people saying vile racist insults and literally saying they want someone to die, and I get the reply that sorry, they reviewed it and the comment was fine. I’m sure the process is even worse now.

        • Landrin201@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The thing is that liberals feel the need to obsess over “fairness.”

          If you really ban hate speech from a place, then it will appear to mostly be inhabited by more left leaning people. The vast majority of hate speech comes from the right.

          But at forms WANT those right WI gers to drive engagement, so they don’t enforce their TOS on open racism so long as it’s a conservative doing it. But if you’re on the left and repost it to criticize it you get dinged.

          It’s bullshit that shows how many companies are run by fascists who don’t bother hiding it anymore. But the liberals eat it up because it wouldn’t be “fair” to ban conservatives “for their conservative views.”

    • Flat Pluto Society@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s a zero percent chance I’m going to install and use Threads, but from screenshots, it looks like Twitter with Instagram’s design language, which is an unimaginably vile combination.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it possible for a lawsuit to somehow ruin both the plaintiff and defendant? Or whatever they are called in civil matters.

        Or is it possible for it to go all the way to the supreme court and somehow result in the dissolution of the supreme court?