Specifically, do you worry that Microsoft is going to eventually do the Microsoft thing and horribly fuck it up for everyone? I’ve really grown to appreciate the language itself, but I’m wary of it getting too ingrained at work only to have the rug pulled out from under us when it’s become hard to back out.

Edit: not really “pulling the rug”, but, you know, doing the Microsoft classic.

  • Rogue@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everything is temporary except for people’s opinion on Microsoft.

    The company is spending a ton on supporting developers, tools, and open source projects but every time they get mentioned people just hark tired lines of past ill deeds.

    • alcasa@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think people should in general put as little trust as possible in corporations. Ensuring your tools, language and platform are as free as possible is a good idea.

      Just look at the problematic situation for VS Code extensions by Microsoft, which are non-free.

      • Rogue@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can agree with the goal but sadly the corporations have already got their claws deep in the tech stack.

        Facebook control React. Google has its hands around Chromium, Android, Go, Angular and I’m sure dozens of others. Then of course Microsoft now own npm, GitHub etc. You’re making your life very difficult if you entirely avoid corporate entities.

        If we don’t give corporations credit when they do run projects well then there’s no incentive for them to not go full on capitalist greed and destroy them.

        • steventrouble@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Corporations aren’t people and don’t behave like people. Giving credit to corporations doesn’t work in the long term, because people who work for them are constantly changing. The ones who did a good job may leave or get replaced, and the ones who take over may not care about maintaining their legacy.

          • Rogue@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Surely the inverse is also true then? People change, leadership changes, goals change so why assume the Microsoft of today is as bad as its past self?

    • hperrin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean if they didn’t want a shit reputation, they shouldn’t have done those past ill deeds.