• digital_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    For me, they signify a time when Television/streaming companies produced content promoting science , rational thought, and blowing crap up.

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Their show was running alongside all the Discovery and History crap about ancient aliens, mermaids, and Bigfoot, so I’m not sure about those first two things.

      • iltoroargento@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        In its first years, it actually ran alongside a lot of interesting and significantly more scholarly shows (than what we have now) on those two networks. The early 2000s actually had some solid programming on the history channel. Pretty quickly devolved into pawn stars and ancient aliens after that, though. So, yeah, half to most of its run was alongside utter garbage.

        Edit for clarification: More scholarly than the current and last decade and a half of shows on history channel and discovery.

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I grew up thinking that. As I got older, I realized they’re actors like Bill Nye. That style of edu- tainment helped me internalize the scientific method. I loved the explosions growing up, but now I just love the humility, educational content, and entertainment. All that being said, the explosion tests they did were a good wake-up call for any young kids who wanted to play with explosives/ fireworks. Also, Discovery should have better advertised the fact they weren’t scientists. They curtailed it by calling them professionals, which is anyone who’s paid.