- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/47828372
Ftr, since I got a report about a supposedly editorialized title on this: It appears the BBC is A/B testing titles, the following titles are offered:
Russian gains accelerate as Ukraine’s Kursk gamble falters
vs.
Ukraine front could ‘collapse’ as Russia gains accelerate, experts warn
You can see that both titles exist(ed) at archive.today.
OPCW Investigation Confirms Russia’s Likely Use of Chemical Weapons Against Ukraine – (Archived)
Russia’s consistent denials that its military forces have deployed illegal chemical weapons in Ukraine were dealt a serious blow on November 18, when the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) announced that it had recently conducted a Technical Assistance Visit to Ukraine and established evidence of chemical weapons use. While the OPCW stopped short of attributing responsibility to Russia, a growing body of evidence points to numerous Russian chemical weapon attacks against Ukrainian front-line troops in violation of the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention, to which Moscow is a party.
The original OPWC report is here.
Other related news say that More Russian regions prepare bomb shelters amid fears of Ukrainian ATACMS strikes – (Archived)
We have news like this from Europe. In 2024.
Their losses, which were already astronomical, accelerate too.
Keep calm and continue supporting Ukraine.
And the same time more than ever russian casualties grow.
Removed by mod
What a weird thing to say.
Removed by mod
Elaborate.
Rule 34: “War is good for business”.
Rule of Acquisition 35: “Peace is good for business.”
#62: The riskier the road, the greater the profit.
#48: The bigger the smile, the sharper the knife.
#95: Expand or die.
#162: Even in the worst of times someone turns a profit.
None of this is a reason to want a genocide on Ukraine lol. I don’t see the relevance.