- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- Oh my god, someone please tell me about understanding of the following facts are wrong: - They did all of that, compromised a SEC employee and the official SEC Twitter account, to move the price of Bitcoin only around 2.2%. - They could have just put sell orders in, and waited a month. - Here’s the hourly BTC high and low prices for the day in question, Jan. 9th., 2024 - All that risk, just to bump the price up $1,000, when it was already trading between $45-47k. - That is so dumb, so painfully dumb, that I almost feel bad about laughing my ass off about this. JFC. 
- Idiot. Why did they not run those searches over the tor network to anonymize themselves? That is quite frankly stupid. And the fact that the SEC was using SMS-based two-factor authentication is also stupid. One time pads or bust motherfuckers. - deleted by creator - OTP 2FA Codes are one time pads - They’re actually not, they’re algorithmically derived state machines, most are public key hashes of secrets concatenated to the current time in seconds from the epoch. - Ideally they would be otp, but that would also be obnoxious. - Oh, interesting. Okay. In that case, they are totally misusing the term. - Yeah, I think it’s because that’s where the model originated, and that’s basically what it’s supposed to be, but having almost everyone synchronized on time gives us a new trick because we can just generate ‘keys’ and have them expire, so even if you manage to get one by force, it’s only valid a short window. Instead of one time pad they often call them one time passwords. - You need extended access to a generator over time to be able to use it, which gives the user a chance to report it for invalidation. - Not perfect, but it does its job fine especially compared to passwords or sms (where you’re at the mercy of the minimum wage kid down at the mall’s Verizon kiosk). 
 
 
- deleted by creator 
 
 
- More like the insecurity exchange commission - Well then again, you expect government agencies to be secure? Yeah, not hardly. 
 
 




