Do you have a criteria for what qualifies as block-worthy offence or are you just doing it when you feel like it?

Bonus question: how long is your block list?

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I block assholes. It drives me up the wall when someone is disrespectful for no reason. I also dislike those who get unnecessarily aggressive on the first message because the previous comment doesn’t align with their views. I’ll usually set a boundary and let people correct their attitude. After that, I’ll block.

    I’m also considering blocking those who make a hobby of subverting the previous comment by twisting people’s words and overloading them with something the person did not mean to say, but those are trickier.

  • Rimu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago
    • Genocide denial
    • Fascism
    • Racism
    • Bad-faith arguments
    • Really really stupid & low effort
    • Consistently really really negative
    • Vote manipulation
    • Spam, CSAM

    I’ve banned 1074 accounts from the instance I run, most of them for boring reasons like spam. Usually between 1 and 10 per day.

  • steeznson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t tend to block anyone online unless I feel like they are harassing me. Haven’t blocked anyone on Lemmy so far. I think people can be too quick to block others who have different points of view these days.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t block people because I think it’s important to understand that people have different viewpoints and ways of articulating them

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Right. Blocking people for no other reason than “I disagree” or “I don’t like that” turns the place in to an echo chamber. Like, if that’s what you want, fine, but one reason I left Reddit was to get out of the echo chamber.

  • Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    There was this French guy posting nudes to every bloody community and filters only worked intermittently.

    Like nice cock bro but it got old quickly.

  • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’ve blocked a few bots but I would only block an actual person if they’re harassing me. I’d rather downvote or report people that are saying hateful things.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Mostly racism, sexism, bad-faith arguments, and some religious stuff. I often double-check a person’s post history to make sure I’m not just reading it wrong. I also do so to make sure I’m not blocking someone for a single bad day or bad take.

    I think younger me would have argued more or tried to convince them of things by showing evidence, but I just don’t have the time or energy at the moment; I have a full-time job, a small farm, and home maintenance on the (used) house I moved into 6 months ago.

  • Anticorp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    People that are needlessly hostile, and persistent on continuing their hostility get blocked. I’ve only needed to do that 1 or 2 times on Lemmy since I already blocked the most overtly hostile instances.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Same. I probably won’t even notice if I keep running into them making the place toxic, but if they just want to argue or be offensive and won’t stop, yeah I’ve blocked a couple

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Posting/commenting right wing garbage or tankie “North Korea is a great place” bullshit. Also flat earther crap. Pretty much any insane, out of touch with reality stuff.

  • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    My blocklist is 30~40 users long. [For reference, my blocklist in Reddit reached 400 or so.]

    To keep it short, I typically block people who, egregious or consistently:

    • show lack of reasoning, even if I agree with the conclusion
    • misrepresent what others say
    • take things off context to judge them, even if I agree with the judgement
    • vomit lots of “hard” certainty on things that they cannot reasonably know (e.g. the others’ emotional states over the internet)
    • engage in passive aggressiveness (note that I tolerate some clear hostility, just not pass-aggro)
    • show clear signs of sealioning (e.g. “I don’t understand” + misrepresentation of what someone else said)
    • tell others shit like “trust me” = “I expect you to be a gullible piece of rubbish”

    Note that “egregious or consistently” are key words here. Like, I’m not going out of my way to block someone out of a brainfart; this is not some sort of petty revenge, it’s just removing from my sight people who I believe to not contribute with my overall Lemmy experience. I also don’t take issue when people block me, for whatever reason they might have.

    • StopJoiningWars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sealioning is a made up term by those too lazy to explain a concept and looking to antagonise others because they “cannot possibly be unaware of X fact that I care so much about”.

      Funnily enough saying someone is sealioning falls within the passive-aggressive behaviour you seem to despise so much.

      • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Sealioning is the discussion equivalent of a DoS (denial of service) attack. In both, the content of the reply is irrelevant; the goal is to flood the person/machine with multiple requests, until they reach a limit and stop dropping drop the requests altogether.

        And while the concept has some problems because it handles some esoteric babble called “intentions” (see: “goal”), it’s still useful when you focus on the behaviour instead.

        Funnily enough saying someone is sealioning falls within the passive-aggressive behaviour you seem to despise so much.

        Pass-aggro is about tone, not content. You can state something like “you’re sealioning” in a passive aggressive way, or a rude way, or under a bald-on record, so goes on.

        [Edit reason: phrasing.]