• Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Am I too harsh […]?

      No. If there’s no way to verify anything then all we have to go on is their word.
      The word of a company generally isn’t worth a whole lot. Same with Telegram.

    • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I mean technically the client is verifiable if you use discord in a browser tab… and verify it every time you load the web page… 🙃

  • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    False, this is a lie.

    Discord is anti-libre software. We do not control it.

    It bans us from proving its claims. It bans us from fixing its lies.

    It fails to include a libre software license text file, like AGPL. Discord is malware, anti-libre.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Interesting. I was able to access the linked whitepaper and repositories without trouble and the 3rd party stuff too. Do you have local config preventing you from downloading the source code to review?

      While I can respect your distaste for non-libre software, you’ll need to back up the malware claim. There are real security concerns out there in common non-libre; labeling things that are not libre as malware solely because they are not libre muddies the waters and makes your message much less palatable.

      • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Where’s the rest of Discord’s source code?

        While it bans us from proving its claims and more, i’ll never let it infect my devices.

        • thesmokingman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The claim is that audio and video are E2EE. I’m not sure how you’re unable to disprove that using the linked code, audit report, and COTS debugging tools. Can you expand on that? I see a lot of FUD without anything more than “they’re not libre” which, again, doesn’t do a great job of selling your point.

          • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Just reverse engineer me bro

            And every update, every other app, all their updates too, across every device… 🚩

            Should we just waste our whole lives nothing but knee deep in disassembled binaries?

            How stupid and gullable does openly hostile Discord think we are?

            Couldn’t be me still coping and shilling trash like this.

  • Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you believe anything you write or say on discord is private. Or would ever even be encrypted, I want whatever you’re smoking please.

  • dyc3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s interesting that the threat model also includes participants. They take into account that when a user leaves, it should be impossible for them to continue listening.

  • OR3X@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hey Discord, give us the ability to stream audio when sharing our screen on Linux ffs.