As a senior developer, I don’t find copilot particularly useful. Maybe it would have been more useful earlier in my career, but at this point writing a prompt to get copilot to regurgitate useful code and massaging the resulting output almost always takes as much or more time as it would for me just to write whatever it is I need to write. If I am able to give copilot a sufficiently specific prompt that it can ‘solve’ my problem for me, I already know how to solve the problem and how to write the code. So all I’m doing is using copilot as a ghost writer instead of writing it myself. And it doesn’t seem to be any faster. The autocomplete features are net helpful because they’re actually what I want often enough to offset the cost of reading the suggestion and deciding if it’s useful. But it’s not a huge difference (vs writing it myself) so that by itself is not sufficiently useful to justify paying the cost myself nor sufficient motivation to go to the effort of convincing my employer to pay for it.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nop, it’s slow and dumb imo. It has only ever been able to write stuff I could type quicker and with less bugs anyways.

    chatgpt has been helpful two or three times. And it makes a decent ish code monkey when you give it a template. But in any editor with multiline editing it’s redundant