Fans have taken to the likes of X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok to question NetherRealm’s decision to market Mortal Kombat 1 as a $70 Switch release. It has been called “robbery” and “disrespectful” to users.

  • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    But it actually is obscenely underpowered, even for mobile, and the CPU is a massive limitation that keeps the vast majority of last gen games from being possible.

    It changed the space by showing low end open world games on handheld were possible, but it hit its ceiling extremely quickly. There’s a reason most AAA games didn’t support it, and it’s because it isn’t capable.

    • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes in a world that expects hardware to always get better and software to always be written sloppily and/or assuming those constant improvements I guess it makes sense to be angry at one of the greatest game consoles ever created

      Remember when games used a few KB of memory and they did smart things to make that work? No you probably don’t because you’d be angered by that hardware’s existence

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Who’s angry? It’s not game developer’s fault that it has 10% of the power needed to run a modern game.

        There is no amount of optimization that could make most modern games run on the switch. It has nothing to do with laziness. If you were a first party making games built from the ground up to be comparable to other modern games, it could not be done.

        There’s a reason Nintendo leans hard into simple physics and extremely arcade style sports games, and it’s not just to be more accessible to casual fans. It’s because it’s literally all the hardware can do.

          • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They chose that hardware because Nvidia was offloading it dirt cheap, so they could make big margins on it.

            That’s the entire reason. There is no other. It’s certainly not that it’s capable of modern gaming, because it isn’t.

            • SnowdenHeroOfOurTime@unilem.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who’s angry?

              Your moronic ass obviously is

              There’s a reason Nintendo leans hard into simple physics and extremely arcade style sports games, and it’s not just to be more accessible to casual fans. It’s because it’s literally all the hardware can do.

              Yeah when they chose the type of games they’d be known for in the 80’s, it sure was specifically because their crystal ball told them:

              They chose that hardware because Nvidia was offloading it dirt cheap, so they could make big margins on it.

              You’re too stupid to spend another moment on

    • ZOSTED@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a PC, PS5, and Switch, and never felt like the Switch was underpowered. Samewise, my phone doesn’t feel underpowered compared to my laptop, because I recognise they’re completely different devices.

      You don’t get a Switch to play the latest God of War, you get it to play Mario and Zelda games, and cute lo-fi indie games

        • ZOSTED@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that’s what I mean. They’re bad comparisons, because we don’t compare the “power” of a phone vs a laptop.

              • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Right… I’m not sure what your point is exactly with that, doom came out in 1993 and had extremely low requirements and looks as dated as it is. Of course it can run on machines like fridges or ATMs or calculators in more recently made devices because the power of the chips in these machines are better then PCs back when doom released.