Specifically thinking of stuff that make your life better in the long run but all kinds of answers are welcome!

I’ve recently learnt about lifetraps and it’s made a huge positive impact on how I view myself and my relationships

  • rouxdoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The HR department at your company is the company’s advocate they are not your advocate.

    • ATQ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am continually flabbergasted that people don’t know this. HR is not your friend.

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      However, the two things aren’t mutally exclusive. Bad behaviour that risks reputational or legal damage to the company will make HR cross. Think about how you frame things when talking to HR

    • spauldo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s important to remember that - unless you work directly for the owner or an executive appointed by the board - they’re not your boss’ advocate either.

      If the company is worth a shit, they don’t want bosses that abuse their power or make their subordinates miserable. Happy employees are productive employees.

      We’ve rid ourselves of a few problem bosses that way. Of course, this only applies to legitimate issues. If a boss is causing people to quit, you’ve got a good case.

      • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The trick is knowing how to phrase it so it’s clear it’s a problem for the company. They usually love SBIN (situation behavior impact next steps) so it’s good format to use:

        Dear HR,

        On the meeting XYZ

        My boss Bully McIdiot was screaming like a toddler at everyone that disagreed with him

        This is preventing the free flow of ideas and Innovation and creating an »»hostile work environment««

        So he should be fired. Preferably from a cannon.

        kisses and hugs,

        the employee of the year

    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is this also true outside America? You know, the kinds of places with unions, labor rights and laws that actually favor the employee?

      • James Kirk@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is still true, at least in Europe. I mean, they’re not actually trying to destroy your life, you know, but they’re after the company’s best interests. They might help you, and might make things not the worst they possibly can, because that’ll give a bad rep, but they’re not your friend.

        • supercriticalcheese@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unions are all workers friend, but they are not your advocate. If your salary is up to the agreed national contract and there is little they can do.

          it depends on the country, and where exactly you work, but in many countries (ehem Italia) they are somewhat too comfortable with the company management to be effective at their job.

  • Confuserated@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    Everyone should know that, very often, they are just wrong. And that’s ok. We all are.

    The more ready you are to really accept that you could be wrong about anything, and admit when you are wrong about something, the better you will make your own life, as well as the lives of those around you.

    • Rottcodd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And not only will you make everyone’s lives better - seemingly ironically, by simply accepting the fact that you’re often wrong, you actually make it more likely that you’ll be right.

      That’s the part that I think people especially need to understand, since a refusal to admit that you’re wrong is generally rooted in an ego-driven need to be right, and refusing to admit that you’re wrong guarantees that right is the one thing that you won’t be. You’ll just keep clinging to the same wrong idea and keep failing to fulfill that need to be right.

      If, on the other hand, you just freely admit that you’re wrong, then you’re instantly free to move on to another, and better, position, making it that much more likely that you’ll actually be right. And if you don’t get it that time, that’s fine - just freely admit that you’re wrong again and move on again. Keep doing that and sooner or later you actually will be right, instead of just pretending to be.

      So you’ll not only make everyone’s lives more pleasant - you’ll actually better serve your desire to be right. What more could you want?

    • whoareu@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am ready to accept that I’m wrong but I don’t want to deal with the bullies after proven wrong :(

      • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Dude, you just don’t care.

        If you’re swayed to their side, then bullied for it, ask them why do they even bother arguing then and why not just go fight random strangers? Then tell them to have some self respect and act like they’ve been here before. Say “for fucks sake” under your breath but still in earshot, shaking your head as you walk away.

    • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, but the solution to being correct is not being wrong. You are just not wrong, and that makes me correct. And that makes you correct. Therefore we cannot be wrong.

    • SevFTW@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Control + Arrows also moves your text cursor by whole words. Combine it with shift and you can easily select a bunch of text without the mouse.

      Another one that took me far too long to learn: Shift + Tab will do the same thing as tab (next element) in reverse

    • espentan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I had a conversation with ChatGPT on that subject. It could not stress enough how terrible it would be for the duck if I brought it home with me, and that was despite me informing the AI that the duck in question was special, that it could talk and had specifically requested to come home with me.

  • MooseGas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can only help people who want to be helped. That goes for yourself, too. You can’t help yourself until you actually have the desire to improve.

    • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      In the same vein, wanting different outcomes requires different incomes.

      Take all your actions and add them up = this. If you wanted that not this, all your inputs need to be under the spotlight and changes made; including and especially habits, vices, behaviours, opinions, assumptions, collection and quality of knowledge, relationships, etc etc. Sometimes the cost or sacrifice from and of yr current self is large and largely invisible.

      Being uncomfortable means you’re learning. Learning means you’re growing. If you’re never uncomfortable, you haven’t reached luxury and made it, you’ve reached stagnation and have stopped ‘living’ your life.

      Choosing the lesser of two evils, or the devil you know, or never doing anything about a life you don’t like or want, is cowardice and will slowly crush your soul into despair. Choosing the unknown might end up sucking, but it might be better. If the known is guaranteed to suck, take the unknown - at least there’s hope there and despair, a feeling worse than pain, is a failing to find hope.

  • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The cable is the weakest link of Earbuds for durability.

    IEM’s with replaceable cables are readily available and getting very cheap & good these days (e.g. Moondrop Chu 2, Truthear Hola, etc)

    • wootz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Better yet, you can get Bluetooth ear hooks for both 2-pin and MMCX IEMs, if you ever want to lose the cable. They last longer than airpod types, offer better sound quality, and you can replace them without replacing the IEMs themselves.

      • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve yet to try these myself but I definitely like the concept. Mostly worried about the weight & comfort, plus large case size (I have the Sony XM5 and love how tiny and pocketable the case is)

  • unwellsnail@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That “coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes COVID-19, can have lasting effects on nearly every organ and organ system of the body weeks, months, and potentially years after infection (11,12). Documented serious post-COVID-19 conditions include cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological, renal, endocrine, hematological, and gastrointestinal complications (8), as well as death.”.

    This is true regardless of symptom severity or health status, every person is at risk. I think most people really aren’t aware of this, they absorbed the narrative that it’s gone, mild, only kills/harms the vulnerable, etc. This isn’t really their fault, there are a lot of factors that have led people to that belief, but people should know their lives and livelihoods are much more at risk now than 4 years ago.

    And that this isn’t inevitable, there are simple methods of disrupting transmission and protecting yourself and others. COVID-19 is here to stay (unless we do something about that) and it has impacts on every person infected and on society at large. That shouldn’t mean folks accept illness and worse quality of life. We adapt and adopt precautions in our life to reduce long-term health impacts, like we’ve done before with many other illnesses that plague humanity.

    • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To add to this, SiDock is an awesome project working on an open-source, patent-free, self-stable antiviral for covid using the computers of volunteers. Anybody can volunteer their spare computational power with a few clicks. I have been crunching it since 2020 and find it very fun.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And the possible risks are compounded with each infection. People are acting like covid just isn’t a problem anymore, like it’s gone away. Meanwhile, roughly 100 Americans are dying of covid every day - and we’re not even in a surge at the moment.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m too lazy to verify your numbers, but realistically, covid nowadays is simply just another life risk. Yes, people are still dying and that’s bad, but most of them are just in the age where people tend to die of such infections.

        I’d guess, there are about 4 million deaths a year in a country the size of the US. So having something on the order of 100k per year due to covid isn’t that concerning, if the lifespan isn’t affected that much.

        We have vaccinations against covid. If you’re properly vaccinated, you’ll probably be fine and younger children will grow up in a world where you just get covid once in a while and get better immunity than we old folks could ever have.

        • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Get this though: many children still do end up hospitalized. The majority of them have no underlying comorbidities or conditions. Their only reason for ending up in hospital is luck of the draw. That was presented at the CDC meeting where the recent booster was approved. It’s not just the elderly or infirm who end up in the hospital and die from it. It’s still killing, hospitalizing, and making seriously ill way more people than flu.

          • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, but as I said: this is just life now.

            You’re getting all raved up about covid, but in reality, this is just a tiny bit more risk. Yes, more risk is bad, but what is the alternative? Continuous shutdown forever?

            You have to accept, that there are just some risks that we have to accept. If you’re going out on the street, there’s a chance you’ll be run over, do you stay indoors all the time because of that?

            • unwellsnail@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, we don’t have to just accept continuous illness and death. Why do you think that it’s necessary for people to suffer when there are simple solutions? There are steps between nothing and total shutdown, read above for some of them.

              Covid isn’t like people going in the street risking getting hit. Covid is a communicable illness spread by others, not a personal choice someone makes. People can’t just choose to never be exposed even if they wanted, we have to interact with others. Further, people can and do avoid being run over in the street by walking on sidewalks and crosswalks, riding in vehicles with protections, with lots of traffic safety rules in place to minimize accidents. Right now our covid elimination strategies are similar to that of traffic safety in the early days of automobiles when there were no safety regulations. Right now we have a bunch of people driving wildly with at best ineffective vaccines, we need a lot more than that if we want to stop repeatedly trying to dodge covid crashes and have any sense of stability in actually living with covid.

              • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are no simple solutions. Vaccines solve 95% of the problem, but not 100%, and the remaining 5% are what you’re complaining about.

                All other solutions can only be temporary, since they require massive changes in pretty much any aspect of our lives, and they will cause massive problems in other areas.

                You’re basically proposing suicide for fear of death.

                • unwellsnail@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Actually I’m proposing life is valuable and we should protect it.

                  The vaccines don’t solve the problem and the solutions do not require massive change, but they do require people reflect on what’s important and adjust their behavior accordingly. I think that living a good life is important so I believe we should do things to better those odds, like reducing the amount of damage covid does to the body. Choosing continuous illness and your worse years coming much sooner sounds closer to suicide to me. Masking, improved ventilation and filtration, paid sick leave, and other simple steps are not absurd and shouldn’t be temporary. We know easy ways to reduce massive suffering, it’s ridiculous to me that people oppose it.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Exercise grows your hippocampus
    • So do antidepressants according to recent research
    • Small hippocampal volume is an excellent predictor of depression and anxiety
    • Exercise grows your hippocampus, in a dose-dependent way
    • Exercise grows your hippocampus
    • Exercise grows your hippocampus

    This is the most important fact I have ever learned.

        • blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It straight up reads like cult craziness or crazy 2 am infomercials. HEAD ON! APPLY DIRECTLY TO FOREHEAD! I’m glad you’ve placebo’d yourself into happiness though lol.

          You said Exercise grows your hippocampus in 4 different bullet points lmfao. Great, it increases size by 2%. It proves nothing about whether it affects depression in adults. In fact, the studies show they do jack shit except help memory lol.

          Exercise training increased hippocampal volume by 2%, effectively reversing age-related loss in volume by 1 to 2 y.

          More showing it means little to nothing:

          https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811917309138

          https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphys.2017.00085/full

          The effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in patients with psychotic disorders

          Four studies examined the effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in people with schizophrenia or first episode psychosis (n = 107). Aerobic exercise did not significantly increase total hippocampal volume compared to control conditions (g = 0.149, 95% CI: -0.31 to 0.60, p = 0.53, Table 2). Among the two studies which reported effects on left/right hippocampus separately, there was no evidence of effects in either region (both p > 0.1). There was also no evidence of heterogeneity or publication bias influencing these results.

          The effect of aerobic exercise on hippocampal volume in other populations

          Data in other populations was insufficient for pooled meta-analyses, and so results from individual trials are summarised below. Individual trials which examined effects of aerobic exercise in patients with depression (Krogh et al., 2014), mild cognitive impairment (Brinke et al., 2014) and probable Alzheimer’s disease (Morris et al., 2017) all found no significant effects on total or left/right hippocampal volumes. One study examining the effects of exercise in young-to-middle-aged adults found no change in total hippocampal volume but did find a significant increase in anterior hippocampal volume following 6 weeks of aerobic exercise (Thomas et al., 2016).

          Effects of exercise in relation to participant age

          Meta-regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between mean sample age and effects of exercise on hippocampal volume. No statistically significant associations of effects of exercise with sample age were found for total, right or left hippocampal volume (all p > 0.05).

          In conclusion, this meta-analysis found no effects of exercise on total hippocampal volume, but did find that exercise interventions retained left hippocampal volume significantly more than control conditions. As these positive effects were also observed among the subgroup of studies of healthy older adults, the findings hold promising implications for using exercise to attenuate age-related neurological decline. Currently, the overall quality of the evidence is compromised by the fact that 10 of the 12 studies included some risk of bias, therefore more high-quality RCTs are now required. In additional to RCTs, a prospective meta-analysis examining how changes in physical activity and fitness predict hippocampal retention/deterioration across the lifespan would provide novel insights into longer-term neural effects of exercise, while also reducing the impact of methodological heterogeneity often found across exercise RCTs. Further research is also required to determine effects in younger people (Riggs et al., 2016), and establish the neurobiological mechanisms through which exercise exerts these effects, in order to design optimal exercise programs for producing neurocognitive enhancements. However, the functional relevance of structural improvements has also yet to be ascertained. Nonetheless, the link between cardiorespiratory fitness with both structural and performance increases indicates this as a suitable target for aerobic training programs to improve brain health.

  • turbonewbe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Unless you are wealthy, if you think life is to expensive you should ask for more taxes, not less.

    The issue is not your net income, but wealth redistribution and solidarity.

    • aesopjah@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except for the part where they just make more tanks instead of give people insulin or whatever

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Taxes are completely fucked. Here’s why.

      ALL of the wealth of a society is produced by workers - they do the mining, the harvesting, the planting, the refining, the quality assurance, the distribution, literally ALL value is produced by the workers.

      The owners got togther and formed a country. Not the workers, not “the people”, only owners formed and organized the country. They chose a private property regime because they now own all the wealth produced by workers. 100% of what workers produce under an employment regime is owned by the owners.

      But the owners can’t sell anything if the workers can’t buy it. And the workers can’t work unless they can support their needs. So the owners take a portion of that value they steal and give it to the workers.

      Then, the government that the owners created take money from the workers in the form of income tax, sales tax, and property tax.

      Then they create NGOs and spend billions of dollars (that they stole from workers, remember) to convince workers to DONATE their salaries to the NGOs to solve social ills created by the owners.

      Then the owners use the government to maintain their own wealth structures and prevent the workers from threatening them. When the owners make mistakes that would cost them fortunes, they take the money from the workers taxes.

      Then they realized that even with this scheme workers were able to buy and own things. So they used their government to change the rules again. Fractional reserve banking let’s a bank hold 100 dollars in cash and create 900 in loans. The bank loans this magical money to workers and the workers collateralize it by giving the bank on lien on their house. The bank now has a more collateral that they can use to generate 9x loan values from, and the act of generating that money causes price inflation in housing, which increases the amount of money the banks can loan out. The net result is that workers pay rent to live in their own homes and that rent goes to the owners who control the government. When this scheme runs into issues, the owners use money taken from the workers (a portion of what was given to them after everything was stolen from them) to smooth out any hiccups and keep the scam rolling.

      So, no, taxes don’t make things better. Only completely dismantling capitalism and running the government for workers by workers and eliminating private property and profit will ever help the 99%. Everything else is a scam and a distraction.

  • Zacryon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Take the following with a big spoon of salt, since I am not a lawyer. Those are the results of interest and some reading on that topic.

    Insulting someone is illegal in Germany (§ 185 StGB). You can get financial penalties and in worst cases some jailtime. However, if you insult someone back immediately, those can cancel each other out and the judge can exempt both of you or one of you from punishment (§ 199 StGB). Furthermore, since it is considered a crime, you could, theoretically, detain the culprit in case they want to flee until you are able to get some identification on them, i.e., see their ID card, or until someone like the police arrives (§ 127 StPO). Also this is not okay if you already know the person or have easy means to determine their ID (e.g., your neighbour or someone working at a facility you visit). In all cases the proportionality of your actions are important. (Beating someone senseless just to detain them, because they called you an avocado in a mean way is certainly not okay. This might be slightly different however, if the person in question commited a violent crime and is still acting violently.)

      • Zacryon@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t find it goofy. Having an opinion and insulting someone are different things.

    • sociablefish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      i still remember when i learned ctrl c and ctrl v in school, that moment was unforgettable because its a basic skill

  • Nia [she/her]@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One for people in the US:

    You aren’t taxed at the higher rate for all of your income when you get a raise that puts you in a higher tax bracket, only the part that is in the range of that bracket specifically. The rest of your income below the bracket is taxed the same as before.

    I’ve seen a lot of people decline promotions and raises over this, and bosses are very happy to let you continue thinking that’s how it works.

    Not sure if that counts as not common knowledge, but a lot of people I know didn’t know it before.

  • zer0hour@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tires can get damaged internally and the only real way to tell is to dismount them from the rim. If there is internal damage they can potentially explode while being filled with air.

    I see a lot of people filling up their tires while sitting straight infront of them and if they do explode it explodes straight outward. My tip is to connect the air gauge and then stand of to the side while filling, just in case.