• MasterNerd@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think witchcraft is silly, but a lot of the things I do are silly so I can’t judge. Everything else is a plus

    • EsteeBestee@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know there are some out there who legitimately believe in the witchcraft they’re performing, spells they cast, crystals, etc., but for me, I do practice wicca, but it’s less about thinking that I’m having a physical effect on the world and more of a way to almost meditate and for sure a way to connect to my spiritual side.

      Even though I know that me performing a ritual to bring a friend some good luck or something won’t actually do anything in the real world, it puts me in a space where I can reflect on my friend and what they mean to me, for example.

      It certainly can be a bit silly, but many of us practice because we like the state of being and state of mind it can put us into, vs truly believing we’re performing magic.

    • FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think it’s any sillier than praying or meditating: Whatever works for you as long as you aren’t shitty to other people.

    • Zev@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Witchcraft is as silly as any religion and or spiritualities… just doesn’t work, all claims without any evidence and are also 100 percent made up by people a long ass time ago … ( pardon my French)

      Akin to children believing in santa or if some kids believed Harry Potter was a true story or something…

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Spiritual practices often involve beliefs about the world that might not be compatible with scientific rationalism, and that’s a valid criticism, but I think it’s a mistake to only consider them as epistemological perspectives. The value of that stuff is for people to have tools for organizing meaning in their lives, conceptual foundations for community, culture, art, etc. I’m an atheist and have many of the usual atheist objections to religious beliefs, but spiritual feelings and experiences are valid and can be considered as distinct from questions about what is reality and how to accomplish goals, and I can respect people who are trying to explore those things.

        • Zev@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I am all for people living how they like. I respect others beliefs and choices and all. I just think the word spirituality is a lot like god … I mean it’s like saying “everything is God” or “the universe is God”; it doesn’t really add anything for me when there’s a label added to something; just kind of confuses things IMHO.

          I love art, music and psychedelic experiences. I enjoy and take notes about some of my dreams. I just don’t attribute anything extra to it; I don’t see the point.

          Shrug “to each their own” ( with respect)

          Spiritual experience to some … Just awesome or good experience to me…

          If You were to have everyone try to define what a spirituality is or what a spiritual experience may be; I think You’d get a lot of different answers; same way people give different definitions/ explanations about what “god” means to them.

          I like to keep things simple; life’s complicated/ confusing enough as it is for me personally.

          I did enjoy reading your reply however; TYVM ☺️

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That… depends on the kind of witchcraft. I’ve definitely seen some sectarian recruitment around some variants; parafernalia peddlers, con men, and wannabe leaders, just flock towards anything that smells of being faith-based.

          • SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think that as things become more popular or more commonly culturally accepted, its usage (especially if it is more new in its acceptance) can be exploited by grifters looking to benefit.

            There are those people, certainly, but I don’t see it in itself as an inherently “religious” thing.

            Yoga used to be thought of in much of the same way, and even grifted as “the true way to healing” by grifters, but it’s more understood now, and the grifters have mostly moved on now.

            However, if bad-faith actors and grifters latch onto & continue to meld with a trend/idea for hundreds and hundreds of years with people offering no further understanding of the thing in question… maybe be wary of that thing.

            • jarfil@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Exactly, the key is understanding, which is discouraged by religions.

              stuff probably too serious for this community

              It goes by steps:

              1. Ignorance: total lack of knowledge about something
              2. Doubt: learning something, but not being sure of its validity
              3. Belief: learning increases to the point where one will defend their point of view

              From there, come two paths:

              1. Scepticism, or scientific method: constant gathering of additional knowledge to support one’s beliefs, without ever abandoning all doubt, iterating over steps 1, 2 and 3
              2. Faith: accepting some beliefs as absolute truth, without any doubt, without need for further proof

              This is where grifters and wannabe leaders come in.

              Once doubt is abandoned and no further proofs are needed, it’s easy to convert someone’s ignorance straight into belief, then into further faith. They don’t need to prove anything, so can make someone faithful believe anything, just by building onto their belief’s narrative.

              Some call it the 70/20/10 rule: present someone faithful with 70% stuff they believe, along with 20% something they’ve heard about but don’t understand, and the remaining 10% they’ll swallow hook, line and sinker, no matter what it is, happily including it into their own beliefs.

              Grifters use this just to get some money: they tell you 70% something you believe in, 20% something that sounds “cool”… and the remaining 10% is the price you need to pay.

              But wannabe leaders take it a step further:

              1. Cult: once a group of people faithful to the same beliefs is gathered, a leader can use the 70/20/10 technique to build out everyone’s beliefs at once
              2. Sect: among those beliefs, a leader introduces the captation of new members, delegating their job and growing up the organization
              3. Religion: with enough beliefs, and faithful believers, a corpus of rites and rules can be established, that believers will follow on their own to reinforce their faith in those same beliefs, removing the need of constant “micromanagement” from their leader

              Over the years, as you said, new wannabe leaders latch onto the established religions, they already have most of their job done, just need to follow the accepted rules for long enough to be recognized as the next rule maker themselves.

              I don’t see it in itself as an inherently “religious” thing

              It is in the sense that faith is the basis of every religion. Without faith, without rejecting doubt, the rest falls and crumbles. So religions make sure to keep that faith going on, and cast any doubt away. That faith, is the real danger.

              For a new grifter in town, the easiest tactic is to find the faithful, so they check out any Religions and Cults. They don’t want Sects, because Sects are being actively monitored by some already experienced leader, but latching onto the beliefs of some Religion, or some nascent Cult, are the easiest “unmonitored” targets they can find.

              Then just parrot back 70% whatever people already believe, add 20% some exotic and cool sounding stuff, and put a sticker with a price on it.

              [source: I’ve had my dose of Religion, I got into a nascent Cult, even got offered to help grow it, left it just in time, saw the tactics used, saw them over and over in a dozen other Cults, saw the grifters flocking like vultures to them all… saw the faithful they were feeding on, and how some of them ended up, jumping from Cult to Cult until they ran out of money, friends, family, and finally their own lives. Then I saw other Religions and Sects, and the patterns are exactly the same everywhere. I thought I was happy, that I had friends… it was all an illusion, the real friends fell prey to it all.]

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just saw a flyer stuck to a light post yesterday for a Witches Festival in my area next week. I took down the information and I’m planning on going! I mean why not? It seems like a fun and silly way to spend the evening and probably meet some wacky people that I thoroughly enjoy being around.

    • essell@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course magic can’t conjure fire or let me fly around the room but…

      Something different does happen when we treat it as real, engage in it that way with sincerity and intent.

      Through this it can have effects on us and the world that can not be achieved by other means, or at least not as easily.

      And in those moments when results appear I bet the majority of people would say “wow, that was magical”