• kitb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    As I understand it, even if we stop 100% of greenhouse gas emissions right now, we’re past the tipping point of self-sustaining climate change. Meaning we absolutely need carbon capture in some form as well as stopping emissions. This isn’t the solution on its own but it is a necessary part of the solution.

    I appreciate that there are people out there trying to sell this as the solution, but don’t let that distract from the actual importance of carbon capture.

    I would welcome being corrected about self-sustaining climate change if I’m wrong about this. It would be a load off my mind.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, basically what my partner says about this. She does climate adaptation research, and says we need carbon capture.

      I just get so annoyed when this is presented as THE solution.

      Honestly the fact that we aren’t treating climate change like a ww2 style economic all hands on deck type of situation says a lot about our species in my opinion. It just makes me sad bcz we could stop the worst climate change effects, and it seems like we kinda just don’t want to at this point.

    • Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re correct. We need to plant trees too. Cut fossil emissions asap. But even that likely won’t be enough. Figuring out carbon capture is a worthwhile endeavor.