In all seriousness it’s very exciting, I just don’t need to see the same information worded 20 different ways from random clickbait sites lol
It did take like 20 years to reach 3 percent and now we’re at 4 so I think it’s alright to be excited.
Turning of the hockey stick. Invest now.
Ah yes, invest in Linux…
well, you can always donate to open source projects…
Look…I use Linux. I love Linux. But let’s be honest. That 4 percent is largely due to the steam deck; a gaming handheld where the vast majority of users don’t know (or care) what operating system it uses as long as they can play their steam games on the go.
That’s not “year of the Linux desktop”, because it’s not a desktop. It just has one hidden under the hood if you want to dig past the steam layer (which, as I said…the vast majority of users never will)
The year of the Linux desktop won’t arrive until there is sufficient market share that software manufacturers are inclined to support us natively. That won’t happen with a gaming handheld because no one would want to use a gaming handheld as a daily driver.
Sorry to be a wet blanket, folks. Downvote away…
Thats like calling MacOS and Playstation rises the “year of the BSD desktop”
Change my mind.
Android devices are the true year of the Linux desktop.
Hard truth right there
Ok, compile some code on your PlayStation
Folding at home?
I agree Steam Deck played a role, but they didn’t sell enough to make that large of an increase. That’d be insane. However, it did cause the appearance of gaming on Linux to change, which is the thing that was holding back a large number of users.
I had used Linux several times over the past decade or so. It was never my main OS, and I had actually stopped using it completely for probably 5 years, maybe more. This is exclusively because gaming on Linux was an issue and I didn’t want to swap OSs just to play a game. Last year I went 100% Linux. I know I’m not the only one, and I’m extremely confident that the increase is mostly this, not the Steam Deck. The number of Steam Decks sold seems to be maybe 6m on the high end of estimates, which is not enough.
The Steam Deck was a catalyst, but it is not the source of the change.
Only 1.63% of Steam users were using Linux in 2023. Since pretty much all Steam Deck users are going to be using Steam, we can’t attribute Linux’s increase in market share to the Steam Deck alone.
That doesnt have any correlation to number of non steamdeck linux users. So 1.63% of steam users could represent a number larger than linux users. And we know steam users is a large number.
It is actually a good thing because “I need windows for gaming” is the biggest reason why compsci and IT people still have windows.
You’re still right that it won’t win over non tech people though.
Gaming is why my son has Windows. Minecraft mods and VR games are basically impossible on Linux, although he actually spends most time in Linux playing Stardew Valley (he’s tried learning Dwarf Fortress twice, and still not really gotten it, but maybe someday).
Minecraft mods don’t work on Linux? Java mods?
I anticipated this question! As far as I can tell many of the mods require using some mod framework that is built up using some Windows program. Certainly documentation in the Minecraft world seems to mostly consist of YouTube videos of someone downloading stuff and clicking through installers, always on Windows.
India, the country with the largest population, has a 15% desktop Linux marketshare.
Additionally, these surveys are highly inaccurate. They are at best a “conservatively low balled figure”. Linux installations don’t send a ping to a server anywhere to count the install, and there’s no other facility to gauge or count through the Linux ecosystem itself. Most computers used for Linux are also sold with Windows pre-installed, which means there’s no clean way to use sales figures either.
All that leaves is the browser user agent when visiting select websites that track and share the number of unique visitors that identify as Linux.
I did the math a few months ago in a different discussion (not on Lemmy) and my math at the time came up to about 50 million desktop Linux users, and that was using the “official” reported numbers of 3.x% at the time.
That also ignores that the Stack Overflow developer survey puts desktop Linux at over 50% for personal use, and (IIRC) about 47% for professional use.
But let’s be honest
You can’t be honest if you look at a single boiled down percentage of a very large, very diverse and technical landscape with more variations and caveats than the English language.
Also, in case anyone is wondering, the Stack Overflow numbers didn’t include WSL. If you do include that then desktop Linux usage was over 70% for personal use.
Obviusly stack overflow users use linux but they are very specialized minority. India on the other hand is actually very interesting statistic. Unusaly high, i wonder why.
I’m Indian. I’m willing to bet a bunch of kids who just built their first pc didn’t realize windows was paid just googled free OS and installed Linux lol
(This is a sarcastic whit at the frugality of my people. Truth is a lot of Indians my age are extremely tech savvy and care about privacy)
Linux Mint checking in!
Yesterday my school principal decided to install Debian on all the school computers, lol.
You would think schools would be all for it, especially since Microsoft office is a subscription service now.
How big is the school? That seems like quite the chore for one guy
And that’s why you use NixOS instead!
We finally hopped ship this year. Some small bs antifeature finally pissed us off enough to (gasp) learn something new and now I can’t find my way out of Vim.
We got it? Nice… Gotta go and make a meme about it.
Let me make this simple for everyone. There’s only a real metric for “the year of the desktop Linux” and that’s whenever Microsoft and Adobe release full featured versions of all their products for Linux. Not slimmed down web versions, no emulation/virtualization/-insert.hack- BS.
Get used it the idea, I know it hurts, but it’s true.
You’re forgetting Autodesk.
They are the real power-holders.Libre Office is already better than MS Office acc. to me (thanks to MSO going downhill starting 2013) and I don’t see Adobe having anything irreplaceable. People that use Adobe stuff do so because it is more convenient and easy to find; and because their coworkers use similar stuff. Any real +ives it has over others are just differential and a matter of time and money for the competitors.
In case of Autodesk CAD software for CIVIL engineers, no FOSS alternatives even come close to them. (Blender is not yet suitable for Civ Engg., while qcad and similar stuff kinda work for basic work) Other competitors are all closed source and still way behind.
_ Oh, and Solidworks
Yeah, those are another two big names that are hard to get into Linux.
No need to get them into Linux (Though Autodesk technically can since their main toolkit is Qt)
Just need to give great alternatives. Like Blender, which easily ups 3dsMax and MayaJust need to give great alternatives.
Alternatives, are, well, alternatives. I’m all for alternatives but they are NOT the actual thing.
If one lives in a bubble and doesn’t to collaborate with others then native Linux apps might work and might even deliver a decent workflow with performance. Once collaboration with Windows/Mac users of a specific industry is required then it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.
You can’t expect to waltz in some office and have people tolerate broken documents of some format and/or the subsequent productivity losses - it just takes you making a few slides for your boss while using LibreOffice and once he opens the document you’ve misaligned items, game over. :)
It also comes down to a question of how much time (days? months?) you want to spend fixing things on Linux that simply work out of the box under Windows for a minimal fee. Buy a Windows license and spend the time you would’ve spent dealing with Linux issues doing your actual job and you’ll, most likely, get a better ROI. Software runs fine, all vendors support whatever you’re trying to do and you’re productive from day zero. Sure, there are annoyances from time to time, but they’re way fewer and simpler to deal with than the hoops you’ve to go through to get a minimal and viable/productive Linux desktop experience.
Once collaboration with Windows/Mac users of a specific industry is required then it’s game over – the “alternatives” aren’t just up to it.
You are right. But when I say “alternatives”, that’s not what I really mean. And there’s a reason I gave the example of Blender. That is because, if your company is using blender, they won’t be needing 3dsMax and other stuff.
waltz in some office and have people tolerate broken documents of some format
Of course not. I am talking about the whole office switching over to (or even starting off with) LibreOffice. Because it’s just that good.
Except that it’s about as slow as MS Office, if run on Windows. But from my exp, everything is slow on Windows, so the ppl not complaining about their Windows being slow, won’t complain about this and the ones complaining about Windows being slow will still do the same thing, except that they will be using LibreOffice.how much time (days? months?) you want to spend fixing things on Linux that simply work out of the box under Windows
Don’t worry, Microsoft is helping us out in this regard, by making Windows as problematic as Linux used to be, while Linux is becoming less so.
In my office exp, the ppl who ask someone to fix their Linux problems are also the ones who ask others to fix their Windows problems. Then the people who tend to fix those Windows problems tend to be doing so, not by understanding the problem, but by following some random tips passed onto them by people who worked there long ago (some of which actually understood what they were doing).
Then there’s the IT department having people who do nothing other than follow instructions and turn out to break stuff more often than not when pushing updates. In my last workplace, there had been more loss of productivity from the Windows computers being stuck for hours in a reboot loop, than from any Linux problems and that was when there were 60% Linux machines. In my current workplace, I do tend to have more Linux problems than Windows, but that is with a Linux to Windows ratio of 10:1.Another anecdote with advanced Networking options. Doing anything out of the mainstream for networking stuff is way easier on Linux for me (coming from someone who did Windows for >15years before getting to Linux for 3years). In fact, it is after I had to do these kinds of configurations during work, is when I realised, how much better it is to have high quality terminal applications with man pages, rather than the mess of Windows System Settings.
And then comes the time when a multi billion dollar contract needs to be made to port a piece of software from Windows 95 to Windows 10 and make it work with new hardware. All because someone managed to save some money the last time, by not thinking about how stuff would work later on when Voodoo cards are no longer available and signed off on getting the software (which was to be used for over 50 years) as a binary blob, instead of getting the source. Short term gains, is all you have, when saving your stuff in non-open standards.
Nowadays, most Linux “problems” I get on work is from people not understanding how to install new stuff. For example, setting up a new docker image; stuff requiring other dependencies; internet telling them to use
aptand then me reminding them to useyum. All the stuff that comes with people predominantly having used Windows and having no idea about Linux.But when making solutions, it doesn’t tend to be much harder to create stuff for Linux than for Windows. If you can’t expect someone to deploy stuff by copying files to the correct place, you will be making an installer/shell script either way.
n my last workplace, there had been more loss of productivity from the Windows computers being stuck for hours in a reboot loop, than from any Linux problems and that was when there were 60% Linux machines.
From your description it seems you had a very inept IT department on that company so, things are expected to fail - most likely a poorly managed AD without any policies running out of the box Windows installations… Linux can’t even be compared because for what’s worth the typical Linux user knows how to deal with issues on his own and/or isn’t stupid enough to mess the system like the average office using Windows worker is.
Yes, Windows is bad, but one thing I know for sure, a decent admin is capable of using group policy is all it takes to have reliable Windows machines. Picking a specific brands and models may help as well as cheap and diverse machines are less predictable thus a big factor when it comes to failure.
I’m not the Microsoft fan you may think I am, in fact I try to avoid it as much as possible - even when that means using macOS :( - but I’ve seen about everything from the startup that does no IT management to the large bank that only buys HP/Dell and applies very strict policies on everything. What I can say for that is that once you’re dealing with hundreds of the same managed machine with the right policies it is really next to impossible to see Windows failing. And Microsoft actually documents things properly because their big companies demand them to do so. You can read that and disable every piece of garbage that comes along with Windows 10/11 and your system will not fail.
if run on Windows. But from my exp, everything is slow on Windows, so the ppl not complaining about their Windows being slow,
Windows isn’t slow, it is just that maybe the garbage that people add to it or their unbranded toaster from 15 years ago is the problem. Although you can argue that Linux is faster in some contexts don’t forget that people running Linux usually are more aware of what’s a good computer and also tend to pick better hardware than the average joe.
Linux as a desktop is slow as well, GNOME relies on web technologies to render a UI, the lag when launching applications is noticeable… for instance on my i7-8550U laptop GNOME is always slower than Windows because you can’t just make a DE that is a half baked browser to perform as fast as something native. Yes, I can opt for KDE or Xfce that are way faster but that’s beside the point because then on those “slow” Windows machines you can also install Windows 7 and they’ll be fast.
Even with KDE if I pick a i3 1st gen (2010) and load with the latest Debian or Fedora KDE it will be slow, as much as with a debloated Windows 11. Obviously that if I take Windows 7 or Debian 5 (both from 2009) they’ll both be very fast.
Another anecdote with advanced Networking options. Doing anything out of the mainstream for networking stuff is way easier on Linux for me (…) how much better it is to have high quality terminal applications with man pages, rather than the mess of Windows System Settings.
I see your point, but this isn’t correct. Windows since Powershell and Windows Terminal isn’t what you think it is. Let me give you a typical network task, changing a VLAN for testing on Windows:
Get-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty "Ethernet 2" -DisplayName "VLAN ID" Set-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty "Ethernet 2" -DisplayName "VLAN ID" -DisplayValue 55 # set the network card to VLAN 55 Reset-NetAdapterAdvancedProperty "Ethernet 2" -DisplayName "VLAN ID" # Reset back to no VLAN tagWant to set a static IP for some config? Sure:
Get-NetIPInterface -InterfaceAlias "Ethernet 2" -AddressFamily "IPv4" | Set-NetIPInterface -Dhcp Disabled Get-NetIPInterface -InterfaceAlias "Ethernet 2" -AddressFamily "IPv4" | New-NetIPAddress -AddressFamily "IPv4" -IPAddress "192.168.97.100" -PrefixLength 24 -DefaultGateway 192.168.97.182 Get-NetIPInterface -InterfaceAlias "Ethernet 2" -AddressFamily "IPv4" | Set-NetIPInterface -Dhcp Enable # back to DHCPWant to automate the installation of a bunch of software? Sure, no need to ever click “next” again:
winget install -e --id VideoLAN.VLC winget install -e --id eloston.ungoogled-chromium winget install -e --id Joplin.Joplin winget install -e --id KeePassXCTeam.KeePassXC ...See, not that hard.
For example, setting up a new docker image; stuff requiring other dependencies; internet telling them to use apt and then me reminding them to use yum. All the stuff that comes with people predominantly having used Windows and having no idea about Linux.
Yes, because that people that came from Windows expect that the setup of a program to be something reasonable, not the mess of dependencies and different technologies that we’ve on Linux. Having a GUI setup that is essentially clicking next until you reach the end is way more user friendly than the docker hype. There’s GNOME Software and all but again not everyone packages for it (in the same way that not everyone packages to the Microsoft store) and since there isn’t a culture of GUI installer for Linux things become way more complex for the end user. Apple even goes further with their typical “drag application to the Applications folder” and done.
The larger number of options and alternatives on Linux while great actually work against the end user, because as you said, people get confused.
We have the same point.
- Bad IT will destroy both Win and Linux systems
- People on Lemmy are much less likely to be fans of either OS
- Advanced stuff can be done better using scripting languages and depending upon the case, it’s fine to not give a -ive point to the OS for not implementing advanced stuff in GUI
- Users who don’t try to understand what’s going on before pressing
NextorYorEnterwill mess up stuff.
In fact, I was starting to learn PowerShell back when I decided to jump to Linux.
There are a few things I have to differ about:
- The Win PCs at my previous workplace were pretty standardised. They were all same models, bought in batches with contracts with the OEMs. Also, the Win PCs had better H/W 7th gen i7s vs the makeshift Ubuntu setup I had made with a 7th gen i5 with similar RAM packages.
- Even though I give a lot of flak to GNOME, it still worked better than said Windows setups.
- A laptop of mine (Win 10) that was going bad fast, due to inadequate cooling, was fixed using Manjaro KDE, which if you try yourself, will realise is actually uselessly pretty heavy on resources due to extra configurations (as kompared to stock KDE). Despite that, I managed to go for higher workloads than Win on that dying laptop. (mainly using Office programs and Web browsers).
Similarly, I am also able to run KDE Plasma on my Core 2 Quad, which, even though is slow (due to high load on Secondary Memory), still managed to be as good as Windows 7, if not better, at basic tasks.
Coming back to the original topic:
My main point is that the main thing that is going for Windows, is not any sort of Objectively Higher Quality design, but it’s current popularity. Similar points for Adobe software and MS Office.On the other hand, Autodesk software for Engineering CAD does have a Objective upper hand, which cannot be trumped by just people one day deciding to shift to FOSS.
You’ll lose your shit when it hits 5%
Unironically, yes. That’ll be a huge milestone. It’ll probably happen pretty soon, too, with the way Linux adoption seems to be accelerating.
Next year: 10%
this may happen because of chromebook’s increasing marketshare
obviously not 10% but 6-7% seems possible
Contrary to the idea that most of these new users come from steam decks, I’ve had 3 of my friends switch to or at least partially use linux. We are certainly growing.
